|
|
| |
Level 2: Met-Proficient |
Level 1: Not Met-Developing |
Level 0: No Evidence |
| A. Social Responsibility |
The candidate demonstrates a sense of fairness, justice, and equity for all students |
The candidate states that all students can learn BUT the candidate’s actions do not confirm the belief. |
No evidence provided. |
|
|
Level 2: Met-Proficient |
| |
Level 2: Met-Proficient |
Level 1: Not Met-Developing |
Level 0: No Evidence |
| B. Social Responsibility |
The candidate interacts effectively with students and/or teachers to provide a positive, structured, safe learning environment. |
The classroom environment is lacking in positive affirmation, structure, OR safety. |
No evidence provided. |
|
|
Level 2: Met-Proficient |
| |
Level 2: Met-Proficient |
Level 1: Not Met-Developing |
Level 0: No Evidence |
| C. Commitment |
The candidate follows through on commitments and takes responsibilities seriously while meeting deadlines |
The candidate makes commitments that he/she is unable to keep. |
No evidence provided. |
|
|
Level 2: Met-Proficient |
| |
Level 2: Met-Proficient |
Level 1: Not Met-Developing |
Level 0: No Evidence |
| D. Commitment |
The candidate shows the self- discipline and work ethic essential to be planned, prepared and organized for successful instruction and learning/ or leadership and supervision to occur. AND The candidate completes assigned tasks on time. |
The candidate’s lack of planning, preparation, or organization hinders successful instruction or leadership. OR The candidate completes assigned tasks after the deadline. |
No evidence provided. |
|
|
Level 2: Met-Proficient |
| |
Level 2: Met-Proficient |
Level 1: Not Met-Developing |
Level 0: No Evidence |
| E. Reflective Practice |
The candidate thoughtfully considers educational matters and the practice of teaching to make informed decisions |
The candidate spends little time reflecting on the practice of teaching to make informed decisions. |
No evidence provided. |
|
|
Level 2: Met-Proficient |
| |
Level 2: Met-Proficient |
Level 1: Not Met-Developing |
Level 0: No Evidence |
| F. Reflective Practice |
The candidate makes choices after pondering ideas and experiences. |
The candidate acts quickly before thinking about the results. |
No evidence provided. |
|
|
Level 2: Met-Proficient |
| |
Level 2: Met-Proficient |
Level 1: Not Met-Developing |
Level 0: No Evidence |
| G. Integrity |
The candidate models good citizenship and acts in an ethical and moral manner. AND The candidate values honesty inside and outside of the classroom and school. |
The candidate does not follow the rules or the law. OR The candidate acts in a way which causes others to question his/her ethics or morals. |
No evidence provided. |
|
|
Level 2: Met-Proficient |
| |
Level 2: Met-Proficient |
Level 1: Not Met-Developing |
Level 0: No Evidence |
| H. Integrity |
The candidate demonstrates a positive commitment to consuming, creating, distributing, and communicating information through all technologies. |
The candidate lacks professional discretion when consuming, creating, distributing, and/or communicating through the use of all technologies. |
No evidence provided. |
|
|
Level 2: Met-Proficient |
| |
Level 2: Met-Proficient |
Level 1: Not Met-Developing |
Level 0: No Evidence |
| I. Professionalism |
The candidate demonstrates appropriate behavior; possesses patience, self- control, and flexibility when obstacles or difficult situations occur. AND The candidate manages personal emotions and feelings and reacts reasonably to situations. AND The candidate acts confidently and maturely. |
The candidate is impatient or inflexible, lacks personal management skills and confidence. |
No evidence provided. |
|
|
Level 2: Met-Proficient |
| |
Level 2: Met-Proficient |
Level 1: Not Met-Developing |
Level 0: No Evidence |
| J. Professionalism |
The candidate effectively uses the English language in speech and writing. |
The candidate has many errors in written communication. |
No evidence provided. |
|
|
Level 2: Met-Proficient |