
Arlene Nicole Lemley
|
Arlene Lemley
Proctorville, Ohio | (304) 208-6107 | anlemley@liberty.edu|
PROFESSIONAL SKILLS
- Taught pre-k- through age 12 for 7 years at Kinderkare.
- Choir leader for teens church choir for 2 years.
- Communicating with staff and collaborating with staff and the community.
- Broad knowledge of vocal techniques and choreography.
EDUCATION
Music Education Choral, Liberty University, Lynchburg, VA Anticipated May 2024
- Practicum experience: 2 30-hour practicums and 2 15-hour practicums.
- Voice lessons for 8 years.
- Instrumental techniques classes: Woodwind, guitar, string.
- 4 piano classes and 2 years of private lessons.
- Theory and aural skills classes.
- Improvisational techniques class.
LEADERSHIP EXPERIENCE:
- Choir leader for teens choir at church for 2 years.
ADDITIONAL EXPERIENCE
Kinderkare, Proctorville, Ohio May 19, 2015-Present
- Kinderkare teacher, Worked with 2–12-year-olds for 6 years.
- Taught music, and dance to students.
- Assisted kinderkare choral concerts for Christmas and graduation.
- Watch and teach children.
- Taught dance classes for children ages 6-12.
- Taught bucket drum lessons for ages 6-10.
- Taught ages 6-10 about instruments, and beginner music theory.
- Worked with students with disabilities ages 2-12. Experience with students with Cyrebral palsy, Autism, ADHD, hearing problems, eye problems.
COMMUNITY SERVICE
TRBC choir, Lynchburg, VA January 2022-April 2023
- Sing in The TRBC choir, helped people get on and off the stage. – served 60 hours
Lead teen church choir. Proctorville, OH August 2018-March 2020
- Picked music for teens to perform.
- Taught teens skits, and dance,
- Lead 3 successful performances.
Underwood Senior Center, Huntington, WV
- Helped make food, check people in,
- participate in activities such as singing and dancing.
- helped serve food
Child-Centered Education
Arlene Lemley
EDUC-360
March 6, 2023
Students Learn in different ways so students should have the opportunity to learn in multiple ways since no child is the same. Teachers should make their lesson plans around the ways that the children in their classroom learn. Students should be able to take what they already know and build upon their learning. However, students should be able to learn by watching and listening to their teacher as well. No child is the same and the lessons should not be taught in just one way but the lessons should be taught in multiple ways to help each individual student. Students should be engaged in the lesson and having fun while learning so they can become a well rounded adult in the future.
Learning should be child centered. Children should be able to learn in the ways that they learn the best. Education is about teaching the individual and students should not have to learn the same way because everyone is different. God made each of us different and gave each of us different gifts and talents which we are supposed to use to help and teach each other. Psalm 139:15-16 says “My frame was not hidden from you when I was being made in secret intricately woven in the depths of the earth your eyes saw the unformed substance in your book were written every one of them, the days that were formed for me, when as yet there was none of them” which is saying that before we were created God knew us and had a plan for us and that we are created with a purpose.
Some students will struggle learning in a classroom that has all of the students learn the exact same way. A teacher can teach a lesson in multiple different ways to help students who learn differently. Some students learn kinesthetically, while others learn more visually or auditorily. Everyone is different and every one has different ways that help them learn better. Having teachers who teach lessons for different types of learners is important for students because they will be able to learn quicker and have a better understanding of a subject if they learn in a way that works best for them.
School as an institution for learning is about having children learn to become well rounded adults in the future. Students should go to school to learn how to do math and reading, however; students should also learn how to live in society and how they should act in the community. Children should have the opportunity to learn more than just their subjects in school but also how to use the things that they learn in the classroom in the community.
The basic nature of the learner is to want to learn and continue to learn more throughout their life. A learning theory I embrace is a constructivists learning theory because Constructivists learning theory is about how people take what they already know, and believe to help them learn something new. Another learning theory I embrace is Existentialism because Children should be able to explore and learn by doing and experiencing the things that they will be learning in the classroom.
Students would be able to learn in the classroom by being taught in different ways. The teacher could teach the lesson in a way that will help the kinesthetic, visual and auditory learners by having activities for kinesthetic learners that will let them be more hands on and the teacher can teach the lesson with pictures and more visuals for the visual learners and the auditory learners can listen to the lesson. A teacher should come up with different ways to help the children in their classroom learn the lesson. Students should also have the opportunity to move around and be able to explore and have fun while learning in the classroom, and teachers need to come up with fun and exciting activities to help students learn so the students will enjoy learning and want to come to their classes.
Some activities and assignments students could do in the classroom would be allowing students to come up to the board and figuring out and answer to a question and writing it on the board. Another activity students could do would be they could listen to some music and think about where the music is from and then they could learn a dance from that country, so they can have a more kinesthetic learning environment and a better understanding of different countries and their music. Students could do experiments to learn about sound waves in a classroom and they could learn about high and low pitches by watching a video as well as doing experiments with sound in a classroom.
The role of the learner is to listen, observe and then do. The learner should listen to the teacher and observe what the teacher does and then the student should be able to do the assignment or the task like the teacher showed them and explained to them how to do. The role of the teacher in the learning process is to teach the lesson and show the students how to do the assignments by being an example of what the students should be able to do to finish the assignment or activity. The role of the teacher and the role of the learner relate to each other because the teacher should explain and show the students how to do a task or activity and then the students should be able to observe and follow the instructions of the teacher to perform the task or the assignment. The students would not be able to do a task correctly with out the teacher showing the students how to do the task and explaining to the students how to do a task.
Diversity factors that a teacher needs to take into account are language, culture, and religion. Diversity in a classroom can impact lesson design because a student that speaks English as a second language might need more instruction. A student with a different cultural background would act differently than the rest of the class so a teacher could teach the students about different cultures to help the students with a different culture feel more comfortable, and to teach the other students about other cultures so they will be more welcoming to students with a different cultural background. Students can also have different beliefs and religions in a classroom and a teacher can teach about different religious holidays and the history of different religions so the students can learn and feel more comfortable and be more welcoming to students with different religions.
Students should have the chance to learn how they learn best and not just have to learn in one way. Students should be able to explore and enjoy learning in the classroom. Teachers should find creative ways to teach the different students that they will have in their classroom and they should be able to create lessons that the students will find fun exciting and educational. The teacher should be able to teach a variety of different students and should be able to teach students that have different backgrounds. Students should be able to learn their subjects in school but they should also learn how to become well rounded individuals so they can become well rounded adults in the future.
|
Field Experience Summary: COMPREHENSIVE (PreK-12) Endorsements (Health and Physical Education, Music, Spanish, TESL, Theatre Arts, Visual Arts) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
§ List all field experiences on this Field Experience Summary (FES) that you completed in your endorsement area through practicums and student teaching. Refer to the Field Experience Rubric below to review target goals for placement expectations. § Although not required, you may also list experiences related to service in actual elementary schools (i.e., after-school tutoring programs, substitute teaching, etc.) on this FES under the section labeled “Previous Experiences”. § You may use your resume and portfolio to highlight all of your other experience with children (i.e., teaching Sunday school, summer camps, etc.), but those experiences should not be included on this FES. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Teacher Candidate: Arlene Lemley |
LU ID: L32057575 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
LU Email: anlemley@liberty.edu |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Hours Indirect vs. Direct
|
Placement Description . |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Course Indicate N/A if not course-based experience |
Date(s) |
Indirect Observe
|
Direct Teach/ Assist |
School Name/Location |
Age/Grade/ Subject Area |
Christian, Private, or Public School |
Cultural Diversity |
Exceptionalities |
||||||||||||||||||
|
Ethnicity |
SES |
Gender |
Language |
Urban |
Rural |
Other |
Learning Disability |
Autism |
Emotional Disturbance |
Intellectual Disability |
Other Health Impairment |
Developmental Delay |
Multiple Disabilities |
Traumatic Brain Injury |
Other |
|||||||||||
|
EXAMPLE |
EDUC 588 |
01/27/2021-05/14/2021 |
44 |
1 |
Linkhorne Elementary School (Lynchburg, VA) |
1st Grade All Subjects |
Public |
X |
X |
X |
|
X |
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|||
|
EDUC 189-001 |
10/23/2022 01/16/2023 |
29 |
1 |
Mt.Airy Elementary School |
K-5th |
Public |
X |
|
X |
X |
|
X |
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
MUSC 491-001 |
10/24/2022 01/31/2023 |
16 |
0 |
William Byrd Middle School |
6th-12th |
Public |
X |
|
X |
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
EDUC 389-001 |
03/19/2023 06/12/2023 |
29 |
1 |
Altavista Elementary School |
k-5th |
Public |
X |
|
X |
|
X |
|
|
X |
X |
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
||||
|
MUSC 438-001 |
02/12/2023 06/12/2023 |
15 |
0 |
Altavista Elementary School |
k-5th |
Public |
X |
|
X |
|
X |
|
|
X |
X |
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
||||
|
Student Teaching Semester [Example: EDST 460] |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
EDST 462-004 |
08/21/2024 10/25/2024 |
127 |
113 |
Fairland High School |
6-12th |
Public |
X |
|
X |
|
|
X |
|
X |
X |
|
|
|
X |
X |
|
|
||||
|
EDST 475-005 |
10/28/2024 12/13/2024 |
91 |
57 |
Chesapeake Elementary School |
K-4th |
Public |
X |
|
X |
|
X |
|
|
X |
X |
|
|
|
X |
X |
|
|
||||
|
TOTAL HOURS |
307 |
172 |
Minimum of 150 direct teaching hours must be included. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Previous Experiences |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Date(s) |
Position/Role Held during Previous Experience (Substitute, IA/TA, paraprofessional, etc.) |
School Name/Location |
Age/Grade/ Subject Area |
Christian, Private, or Public School |
Cultural Diversity |
Exceptionalities |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Ethnicity |
SES |
Gender |
Language |
Urban |
Rural |
Other |
Learning Disability |
Autism |
Emotional Disturbance |
Intellectual Disability |
Other Health Impairment |
Developmental Delay |
Multiple Disabilities |
Traumatic Brain Injury |
Other |
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Professional Organization Memberships |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Name of Organization |
Initial Membership |
Renewal Date |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Month |
Year |
Month |
Year |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
NAFME |
September |
2022 |
June |
2023 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
VMEA |
September |
2022 |
June |
2023 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Field Experience Summary: Comprehensive (preK-12) Endorsements (Health and Physical Education, Music, Spanish, TESL, Theatre Arts, Visual Arts)
Use this Field Experience Rubric as a guide in seeking diverse field experiences throughout your program. Your University Supervisor will use this rubric to evaluate your FES during your student teaching semester. Membership and participation in professional organization(s) is also expected. Current membership (valid through the end of the student teaching semester) is required in an organization for your endorsement area (e.g., PDK, KDP, ILA, NAEYC, NMSA, CEC, ASU, CEAI, other state and local organizations, etc.)
|
Teacher Candidate: Arlene Lemley |
LU ID: L32057575 |
|||
|
CAEP |
InTASC |
Setting |
Recommended |
Required |
|
R1.1, R1.3, R2.3 |
1, 3, 7 |
Christian School |
One or more field experiences in a Christian school setting (must be an in-person visit). |
One field experience in a Christian school setting (may be virtual if an in-person visit is not available.) |
|
R1.1, R1.3, R2.3 |
3, 7, 8 |
Public School |
Two or more field experiences in public school setting. |
One field experience in public school setting. |
|
R1.1, R2.3 |
1, 2, 3 |
Cultural diversity (ethnicity, SES, gender, language, urban, rural, etc.) |
Combined field experiences include placements with comprehensive (PreK-12) students who represent three or more types of cultural diversity. |
Combined field experiences include placements with comprehensive (PreK-12) students who represent two types of cultural diversity. |
|
R1.1, R1.3, R2.3 |
1, 2, 8 |
Exceptionalities: (learning disability, autism, emotional disturbance, intellectual disability, other health impairment, developmental delay, multiple disabilities, traumatic brain injury, etc.) |
Combined field experiences include placements with comprehensive (PreK-12) students who represent three or more types of exceptionalities. |
Combined field experiences include placements with comprehensive (PreK-12) students who represent two types of exceptionalities. |
|
R1.2, R2.3 |
5, 7 |
Grades PreK-6
|
Two or more field experiences in grades preK-6. |
One field experience in grades preK-6.
|
|
R1.2, R2.3 |
5, 7 |
Grades 6-12
|
Two or more field experiences in grades 6-12. (experiences in both 6-8 and 9-12 strongly recommended) |
One field experience in grades 6-12. (experiences in both 6-8 and 9-12 strongly recommended) |
|
R1.4, R3.2 |
9, 10 |
Professional Organizations |
Two or more current memberships (valid through the end of the student teaching semester) in an educational professional organization. |
One current membership (valid through the end of the student teaching semester) in an educational professional organization. (eg. CEAI membership) |
|
R1.3, R2.3 |
7, 8 |
Student Teaching |
Successfully completed all required weeks of student teaching with more than 150 direct teaching hours. |
Successfully completed all required weeks of student teaching with 150 direct teaching hours. |
PRE CPAST from two practicum experiences and a final observation from student teaching.
Placement Details
Intern:Arlene LemleySupervisor(s):Michele WorleyMentor(s):Kelli HessCourse-Section:EDUC 189-Section 001
Pre-CPAST Assignment 05-22 Create PDF
Assessor:
Kelli Hess
Comments and Feedback:
Suggested Letter Grade Rubric Directions
Please provide a suggested letter grade to signify the candidate's overall performance and effort in the placement.
Rubric Criteria Rating Comment Standards
Suggested Letter Grade Rubric Please provide a suggested letter grade to signify the candidate's overall performance and effort during the practicum. 3.000-B
3.000 pts | 75 %
Pre-CPAST Directions
Directions – The form will be used once during the course of the term and will be provided by the Program Coordinator to the University Supervisor, Host Teacher, and Candidate.
Additional information about and support for using the form can be found in the “Glossary” and “Look Fors” for select rows (indicated by an *) at the end of this document
Glossary of Terms
Glossary of Terms
Analysis: Careful and critical examination of data and/or processes to identify key components and potential outcomes.
Assessment: “Process of monitoring, measuring, evaluating, documenting, reflecting on, and adjusting teaching and relearning to ensure that learners reach high levels of Achievement
Candidate: (Also known as "intern") An individual participating in a full-time field experience in a P12 classroom in order to obtain professional education licensure/certification.
Cooperating Teachers: (Also known as “mentor teachers”) Teachers in schools who mentor and supervise student teachers in their classrooms for the duration of a student teaching and/or field experience.
Data-informed decisions: “Focuses on using student assessment data and relevant background information to inform decisions related to planning and implementing instructional strategies at the district, school, classroom, and individual student levels.”
Developmental Theory (General): Theories that describe the stages of development of children/adolescents (e.g., Erikson’s Theory of Psychosocial Development, Kohlberg’s Theory of Moral Development, Piaget’s Cognitive Development Theory, Behavioral Theories, and Sociocultural Theories).
Developmental Theory (Content-Specific): Content-specific teaching that organizes activities and learning tasks to help learners move from one level to the next.
Evidence: Artifacts that document and demonstrate how [the student teacher] planned and implemented instruction
Feedback: “Information communicated to the learner that is intended to modify the learner’s thinking or behavior for the purpose of improving learning.”
Formative Assessment: “Assessment used continuously throughout learning and teaching, allowing teachers to adjust instruction to improve learner achievement.”1
Goals: See definition for “Measurable Goals.”
Learner: Any P12 student in the student teacher’s classroom.
Learning Environment: Any setting where learning occurs. The term may refer to the physical environment (e.g., the classroom), as well as the classroom management procedures and activities that enable teaching and learning to take place.
Measurable Goals: “Provides information for describing, assessing, and evaluating student achievement.”
Mentor Teachers: See definition for “Cooperating Teachers.”
Objectives/Targets: P12 student (learner) learning outcomes to be achieved by the end of the lesson or learning segment.
Problem Solving: A mental process that involves discovering, analyzing, and solving problems. The ultimate goal of problem-solving is to overcome obstacles and find a solution that best resolves the issue.
Program Coordinator: Faculty or staff member from a college or university who coordinates/manages the administrative components of a teacher educator licensure program.
Research: "The use of rigorous, systematic, and objective methodologies to obtain reliable and valid knowledge."
Targets: See definition for 'Objectives/Targets.'
University Supervisor (US): The university instructor assigned to the student teacher who regularly observes his/her performance to provide feedback on strengths and weaknesses. The US coordinates the student teacher’s evaluation, and is responsible for recording the consensus scores using this form.
Rubric Criteria Rating Comment Standards
Pre-CPAST Evaluation Rubric A. Focus for Learning: Standards and Objectives/Targets 1.000-Emerging INTASC-2013.7.a, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.3
- B. Assessment of P-12 Learning 2.000-Meets Expectations INTASC-2013.6.b, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.3
- C. Learning Target and Directions 2.000-Meets Expectations INTASC-2013.7.c, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.3
- D. Checking for Understanding and Adjusting Instruction through Formative Assessment 2.000-Meets Expectations INTASC-2013.8.b, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.3
- E. Digital Tools and Resources 2.000-Meets Expectations INTASC.6.I, INTASC.5.L, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.2
- F. Safe and Respectful Learning Environment 2.000-Meets Expectations INTASC-2013.3.d, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.1
- G. Data-Guided Instruction 2.000-Meets Expectations INTASC.6.I, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.3
- H. Feedback to Learners 1.000-Emerging INTASC-2013.6.d, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.3
- I. Assessment Techniques 1.000-Emerging INTASC-2013.7.d, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.3
- J. Connections to Research and Theory N/A CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.1
- K. Demonstrates Punctuality 2.000-Meets Expectations INTASC-2013.9.o, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.4
- L. Meets Deadlines and Obligations 2.000-Meets Expectations INTASC-2013.9.o, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.4
- M. Collaboration 2.000-Meets Expectations INTASC-2013.10.b, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.4
- N. Responds Positively to Feedback and Constructive Criticism 2.000-Meets Expectations INTASC-2013.9.n, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.4
23.000 pts | 88.46 %
Rubric Criteria Rating Comment Standards
Setting School Setting (This section's scoring will not affect the student's overall score. The point values are for reporting purposes only.) 0.000-Rural
0.000 pts
Rubric Criteria Rating Comment Standards
Method of Instructional Delivery Method of Instructional Delivery (This section's scoring will not affect the student's overall score. The point values are for reporting purposes only.) 1.000-In Person Only
1.000 pts | 33.33 %
Directions for Pre-SCRIP Dispositions Assessment Rubric
Dear Host Teacher, Cooperating Teacher, or On-site Mentor,
Before completing the SCRIP/Pre-SCRIP assessment, please review the SCRIP/Pre-SCRIP Scorer Training video. This video will explain the importance of this assessment and will provide direction on how to accurately score the candidate using the instrument. The video is less than 15 minutes in length. Here is the link: https://watch.liberty.edu/media/t/1_gvd5n0i1
Also attached is a copy of the PowerPoint used in the video in case you would like to refer back to the slides after watching the training. Thank you so much for investing in the training and preparation of future educators!
Rubric Criteria Rating Comment Standards
Pre-SCRIP Dispositions Assessment Rubric Social Responsibility Cross-Cutting Theme: Diversity 2.000-Level 2: Met- Proficient INTASC-2013.10, INTASC-2013.6, INTASC-2013.7, INTASC-2013.2, INTASC-2013.3, NASDTEC-MCEE-2015.1, NASDTEC-MCEE-2015.3, NASDTEC-MCEE-2015.2, NASDTEC-MCEE-2015.5, NASDTEC-MCEE-2015.4, CAEP-2013 (rev).1.1, CAEP-2013 (rev).1.4, InTASC-2017.2.d, CAEP-2013 (rev).CCT-Diversity, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.4
Commitment 2.000-Level 2: Met- Proficient INTASC-2013.10, INTASC-2013.6, INTASC-2013.7, INTASC-2013.9, INTASC-2013.2, INTASC-2013.1, INTASC-2013.9.o, NASDTEC-MCEE-2015.1, NASDTEC-MCEE-2015.2, CAEP-2013 (rev).1.1, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.4
Reflective Practice 0.000-Level 0: Not Met- No Evidence INTASC-2013.10, INTASC-2013.6, INTASC-2013.8, INTASC-2013.2, INTASC-2013.3, INTASC-2013.1, INTASC-2013.9.g, NASDTEC-MCEE-2015.3, NASDTEC-MCEE-2015.2, NASDTEC-MCEE-2015.5, NASDTEC-MCEE-2015.4, CAEP-2013 (rev).1.1, CAEP-2013 (rev).1.2, ISTE-2017.7, CAEP-2013 (rev).1.3, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.4
Integrity 2.000-Level 2: Met- Proficient INTASC-2013.10, INTASC-2013.7, INTASC-2013.9, INTASC-2013.5, INTASC-2013.1, NASDTEC-MCEE-2015.1, NASDTEC-MCEE-2015.3, NASDTEC-MCEE-2015.2, NASDTEC-MCEE-2015.4, CAEP-2013 (rev).1.1, ISTE-2017.3, InTASC-2017.9.m, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.4
Professionalism 2.000-Level 2: Met- Proficient INTASC-2013.10, INTASC-2013.6, INTASC-2013.7, INTASC-2013.9, INTASC-2013.2, INTASC-2013.1, NASDTEC-MCEE-2015.1, NASDTEC-MCEE-2015.3, NASDTEC-MCEE-2015.4, CAEP-2013 (rev).1.1, CAEP-2013 (rev).1.2, InTASC-2017.10.r, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.4
8.000 pts | 80 %
Standards Chart
<<Back
Copyright © 2024 Watermark Insights, LLC and its affiliates. All Rights Reserved. Need Help? Contact support@watermarkinsights.com
Placement Details
Intern:Arlene LemleySupervisor(s):Michele WorleyMentor(s):Aimee RosserCourse-Section:EDUC 389-Section 001
Pre-CPAST Assignment 11-22 Create PDF
Assessor:
Aimee Rosser
Comments and Feedback:
Pre-CPAST Directions
Directions – The form will be used once during the course of the term and will be provided by the Program Coordinator to the University Supervisor, Host Teacher, and Candidate.
Additional information about and support for using the form can be found in the “Glossary” and “Look Fors” for select rows (indicated by an *) at the end of this document
Glossary of Terms
Glossary of Terms
Analysis: Careful and critical examination of data and/or processes to identify key components and potential outcomes.
Assessment: “Process of monitoring, measuring, evaluating, documenting, reflecting on, and adjusting teaching and relearning to ensure that learners reach high levels of Achievement
Candidate: (Also known as "intern") An individual participating in a full-time field experience in a P12 classroom in order to obtain professional education licensure/certification.
Cooperating Teachers: (Also known as “mentor teachers”) Teachers in schools who mentor and supervise student teachers in their classrooms for the duration of a student teaching and/or field experience.
Data-informed decisions: “Focuses on using student assessment data and relevant background information to inform decisions related to planning and implementing instructional strategies at the district, school, classroom, and individual student levels.”
Developmental Theory (General): Theories that describe the stages of development of children/adolescents (e.g., Erikson’s Theory of Psychosocial Development, Kohlberg’s Theory of Moral Development, Piaget’s Cognitive Development Theory, Behavioral Theories, and Sociocultural Theories).
Developmental Theory (Content-Specific): Content-specific teaching that organizes activities and learning tasks to help learners move from one level to the next.
Evidence: Artifacts that document and demonstrate how [the student teacher] planned and implemented instruction
Feedback: “Information communicated to the learner that is intended to modify the learner’s thinking or behavior for the purpose of improving learning.”
Formative Assessment: “Assessment used continuously throughout learning and teaching, allowing teachers to adjust instruction to improve learner achievement.”1
Goals: See definition for “Measurable Goals.”
Learner: Any P12 student in the student teacher’s classroom.
Learning Environment: Any setting where learning occurs. The term may refer to the physical environment (e.g., the classroom), as well as the classroom management procedures and activities that enable teaching and learning to take place.
Measurable Goals: “Provides information for describing, assessing, and evaluating student achievement.”
Mentor Teachers: See definition for “Cooperating Teachers.”
Objectives/Targets: P12 student (learner) learning outcomes to be achieved by the end of the lesson or learning segment.
Problem Solving: A mental process that involves discovering, analyzing, and solving problems. The ultimate goal of problem-solving is to overcome obstacles and find a solution that best resolves the issue.
Program Coordinator: Faculty or staff member from a college or university who coordinates/manages the administrative components of a teacher educator licensure program.
Research: "The use of rigorous, systematic, and objective methodologies to obtain reliable and valid knowledge."
Targets: See definition for 'Objectives/Targets.'
University Supervisor (US): The university instructor assigned to the student teacher who regularly observes his/her performance to provide feedback on strengths and weaknesses. The US coordinates the student teacher’s evaluation, and is responsible for recording the consensus scores using this form.
Suggested Letter Grade Rubric Directions
Please provide a suggested letter grade to signify the candidate's overall performance and effort in the placement.
Rubric Criteria Rating Comment Standards
Suggested Letter Grade Rubric Please provide a suggested letter grade to signify the candidate's overall performance and effort during the practicum. 4.000-A Ms. Lemley was pleasant and professional during her practicum. She was helpful and inquisitive. She seemed a little hesitant at first to participate with the younger students in silly songs and dances, but by the end of the practicum, she appeared to be more comfortable participating in all of the activities. She was always willing to help sing parts and guide students in playing instruments.
4.000 pts | 100 %
Rubric Criteria Rating Comment Standards
Pre-CPAST Evaluation Rubric A. Focus for Learning: Standards and Objectives/Targets 2.000-Meets Expectations Ms. Lemley's lesson encouraged creativity and student collaboration, two standards in elementary music. InTASC-2017.7.a, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.3
- B. Assessment of P-12 Learning 2.000-Meets Expectations All students were engaged in the lesson and could be assessed through their participation. InTASC-2017.6.b, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.3
- C. Learning Target and Directions 2.000-Meets Expectations Ms. Lemley clearly stated the goal of the lesson. She guided students in choosing instrument sounds to represent words in a story. She could have gone one step further in listing ahead of time all of the words that would be represented to better organize and help students remember the words for which they were responsible. InTASC-2017.7.c, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.3
- D. Checking for Understanding and Adjusting Instruction through Formative Assessment 2.000-Meets Expectations Ms. Lemley responded and redirected students who were not playing at the correct time. InTASC-2017.8.b, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.3
- E. Digital Tools and Resources 0.000-Does Not Meet Expectations The lesson did not require the use of technology. However, there was an opportunity to incorporate technology to enhance organization and implementation of the students' participation. InTASC-2017.5.l, InTASC-2017.6.i, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.2
- F. Safe and Respectful Learning Environment 2.000-Meets Expectations The students were very attentive and respectful to Ms. Lemley. She informed students that she would be calling on those who were sitting quietly to first choose an instrument. If there was any talking or playing out of turn, she addressed it without causing disruption to the lesson. InTASC-2017.3.d, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.1
- G. Data-Guided Instruction 2.000-Meets Expectations Ms. Lemley based her objectives on state and national music standards. She took into account the terminology that she knew the students had been learning. InTASC-2017.6.l, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.3
- H. Feedback to Learners 2.000-Meets Expectations Ms. Lemley made affirmative statements to students who played on cue. She guided students who were not playing at the correct time. InTASC-2017.6.d, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.3
- I. Assessmnt Techniques 1.000-Emerging Ms. Lemley assessed through observation of student participation. She also could have led student discussion after the story about how well different instrument sounds represented the words and why. InTASC-2017.7.d, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.3
- J. Connections to Research and Theory 1.000-Emerging CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.1
- K. Demonstrates Punctuality 2.000-Meets Expectations Ms. Lemley gave advance notice and confirmed it would suit me each time she visited the school. She followed through and was present every time she made plans to be there. If she was ever minutes late, she would stay longer than she had planned to make sure that the hours she recorded were accurate and meaningful. InTASC-2017.9.o, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.4
- L. Meets Deadlines and Obligations 2.000-Meets Expectations InTASC-2017.9.o, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.4
- M. Collaboration 2.000-Meets Expectations Ms. Lemley consistently offered to help hand out materials, co-lead in part singing, and help in anyway she could. She even brought her clarinet to demonstrate to students during one of my lessons about orchestral instruments. InTASC-2017.10.b, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.4
- N. Responds Positively to Feedback and Constructive Criticism 2.000-Meets Expectations Ms. Lemley was very receptive to the feedback I gave on her lesson. InTASC-2017.9.n, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.4
24.000 pts | 85.71 %
Rubric Criteria Rating Comment Standards
School Setting School Setting (This section's scoring will not affect the student's overall score. The point values are for reporting purposes only.) 1.000-Town
1.000 pts | 33.33 %
Rubric Criteria Rating Comment Standards
Method of Instructional Delivery Element 1Method of Instructional Delivery (This section's scoring will not affect the student's overall score. The point values are for reporting purposes only.) 1.000-In Person Only
1.000 pts | 33.33 %
Directions for Pre-SCRIP Dispositions Assessment Rubric
Dear Host Teacher, Cooperating Teacher, or On-site Mentor,
Before completing the SCRIP/Pre-SCRIP assessment, please review the SCRIP/Pre-SCRIP Scorer Training video. This video will explain the importance of this assessment and will provide direction on how to accurately score the candidate using the instrument. The video is less than 15 minutes in length. Here is the link: https://watch.liberty.edu/media/t/1_103thmlr
Also attached is a copy of the PowerPoint used in the video in case you would like to refer back to the slides after watching the training. Thank you so much for investing in the training and preparation of future educators!
Rubric Criteria Rating Comment Standards
Pre-SCRIP Dispositions Assessment Rubric A. Social Responsibility 2.000-Level 2: Met-Proficient NASDTEC-MCEE-2015.3, InTASC-2017.9.m, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.4, CAEP-Revised-Advanced-2022.RA1.1f
- B. Social Responsibility 2.000-Level 2: Met-Proficient Ms. Lemley reported to me any unsafe behavior she witnessed that required attention. She maintained a positive rapport with the students. NASDTEC-MCEE-2015.3, InTASC-2017.10.c, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.4, CAEP-Revised-Advanced-2022.RA1.1f
- C. Commitment 2.000-Level 2: Met-Proficient NASDTEC-MCEE-2015.1, InTASC-2017.10.p, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.4, CAEP-Revised-Advanced-2022.RA1.1f
- D. Commitment 2.000-Level 2: Met-Proficient Ms. Lemley gave me her lesson plan ahead of time. She arrived at school in ample time to thoughtfully set up the instruments prior to the students entering the classroom. NASDTEC-MCEE-2015.1, InTASC-2017.9.k, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.4, CAEP-Revised-Advanced-2022.RA1.1f
- E. Reflective Practice 2.000-Level 2: Met-Proficient NASDTEC-MCEE-2015.2, InTASC-2017.9.c, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.4, CAEP-Revised-Advanced-2022.RA1.1f
- F. Reflective Practice 2.000-Level 2: Met-Proficient Ms. Lemley asked questions about lessons I taught and made connections to things she had previously experienced or learned. NASDTEC-MCEE-2015.2, InTASC-2017.9.c, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.4, CAEP-Revised-Advanced-2022.RA1.1f
- G. Integrity 2.000-Level 2: Met-Proficient NASDTEC-MCEE-2015.2, InTASC-2017.9.o, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.4, CAEP-Revised-Advanced-2022.RA1.1f
- H. Integrity 2.000-Level 2: Met-Proficient NASDTEC-MCEE-2015.5, InTASC-2017.10.g, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.4, CAEP-Revised-Advanced-2022.RA1.1f, ISTE.2.3, ISTE.LDR.3
- I. Professionalism 2.000-Level 2: Met-Proficient NASDTEC-MCEE-2015.2, InTASC-2017.10.c, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.4, CAEP-Revised-Advanced-2022.RA1.1f
- J. Professionalism 2.000-Level 2: Met-Proficient NASDTEC-MCEE-2015.2, InTASC-2017.9.c, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.4, CAEP-Revised-Advanced-2022.RA1.1f
20.000 pts | 100 %
Standards Chart
nstitution: Liberty University
Student: Arlene Lemley
Supervisor: Tessa Leep
Site: Fairland High School
Date: Fall 2024 - Term A (08/19/24 - 12/13/24)
Type: EDST 462 (OSS_PT1(Onsite Supervisor - Site Supervisor))
Final Completed: 10/24/24 11:58 AM
ST Evaluation Final - Mentor
Section Weight: 0%
CPAST Student Teaching Evaluation Final
Exceeds Expectations (3.000 pts) Meets Expectations (2.000 pts) Emerging (1.000 pt) Does Not Meet Expectations (0.000 pt)
- A. Focus for Learning: Standards and Objectives/Targ (1.000,4.8%)INTASC-2013.7.
Plans align to appropriate P-12 state learning standards
AND
Goals are measureable
AND
Standards, objectives/targets, and learning tasks are consistently aligned with each other
AND
Articulates objectives/targets that are appropriate for learners and attend to appropriate developmental
progressions relative to age and content-area
Plans align to appropriate P-12 state learning standards
AND
Goals are measureable
AND
Standards, objectives/ targets, and learning tasks are consistently alignedwith each other
AND
Articulates objectives/targets that are appropriate for learners
Plans align to appropriate P-12 state learning standards
AND/OR
Some goals are measureable
AND/OR
Standards, objectives/targets, and learning tasks, are loosely or are not consistently aligned with each other
AND/OR
Articulates some objectives/targets that are appropriate for learners
Plans do not align to the appropriate P-12 state learning standards
AND/OR
Goals are absent or not measureable
AND/OR
Standards, objectives/targets, and learning tasks are not aligned with each other
AND/OR
Does not articulate objectives/targets that are appropriate for learners
Question Comments : *Comment Required
Plans were appropriate for the varsity vocal class.
Exceeds (3.000 pts)
Exceeds Expectations (3.000 pts)
Meets Expectations (2.000 pts)
Emerging (1.000 pt)
Does Not Meet Expectations (0.000 pt)
- B. Materials and Resources
(1.000, 4.8%)
INTASC-2013.7.b
Uses a variety of materials and resources that
- 1. Align with all objectives/targets 2. Make content relevant to learners 3. Encourage individualization of learning
Uses a variety of materials and resources that
- 1. Align with all objectives/targets 2. Make content relevant to learners
Uses materials and resources that align with some of the objectives/targets
Materials and resources do not align with objectives/targets
Question Comments : *Comment Required
Materials were appropriate for the class.
Exceeds (3.000 pts)
Exceeds Expectations (3.000 pts)
Meets Expectations (2.000 pts)
Emerging (1.000 pt)
Does Not Meet Expectations (0.000 pt)
- C. Assessment of P-12 Learning
(1.000, 4.8%)
INTASC-2013.6.b
Plans a variety of assessments that 1. Provide opportunities for learners of varying abilities to illustrate
competence
- 2. Align with the appropriate P-12 state learning standards
- 3. Are culturally relevant and draw from learners’ funds of knowledge 4. Promote learner growth
Plans a variety of assessments that 1. Provide opportunities for learners toillustrate competence
- 2. Align with the appropriate P-12 state learning standards
- 3. Are culturally relevant and draw from learners’ funds of knowledge
Planned assessments
- 1. Provide opportunities for some learners to illustrate competence
- 2. Align with the appropriate P-12 state learning standards
Planned assessments
- 1. Are not included
OR
- 2. Do not align with the appropriate P 12 state learning standards
Question Comments : *Comment Required
Assessments were included in lesson plans.
Exceeds (3.000 pts)
Exceeds Expectations (3.000 pts)
Meets Expectations (2.000 pts)
Emerging (1.000 pt)
Does Not Meet Expectations (0.000 pt)
- D. Differentiated Methods
(1.000, 4.8%)
INTASC-2013.2.c
Lessons make meaningful and culturally relevant connections to 1. Learners’ prior knowledge
- 2. Previous lessons
- 3. Future learning
- 4. Other disciplines and real-world experiences
AND
Differentiation of instruction supports learner development
AND
Organizes instruction to ensure content is comprehensible, relevant, and challenging for learners
Lessons make clear and coherent connections to
- 1. Learners’ prior knowledge
- 2. Previous lessons
- 3. Future learning
AND
Differentiation of instruction supports learner development
AND
Organizes instruction to ensure content is comprehensible and relevant for learners
Lessons make an attempt to build on, but are not completely successful at connecting to
- 1. Learners’ prior knowledge,
- 2. Previous lessons, OR future learning
AND
Differentiation of instruction is minimal
AND
Organizes instruction to ensure content is comprehensible for learners
Lessons do not build on or connect to learners’ prior knowledge
AND/OR
Explanations given are illogical or inaccurate as to how the content connects to previous and future learning
AND/OR
Differentiation of instruction is absent
Question Comments : *Comment Required
Plans included all components listed.
Exceeds (3.000 pts)
Exceeds Expectations (3.000 pts)
Meets Expectations (2.000 pts)
Emerging (1.000 pt)
Does Not Meet Expectations (0.000 pt)
- E. Learning Target and Directions
(1.000, 4.8%)
INTASC-2013.7.c
Articulates accurate and coherent learning targets
AND
Articulates accurate
directions/explanations throughout the lesson
AND
Sequences learning experiences appropriately
Articulates an accurate learning target
AND
Articulates accurate directions/ explanations
AND
Sequences learning experiences appropriately
Articulates an inaccurate learning target
AND/OR
Articulates inaccurate
directions/explanations
Does not articulate the learning target
OR
Does not articulate directions/ explanations
Question Comments : *Comment Required
Student teacher was clear on expectations and directions in class.
Exceeds (3.000 pts)
Exceeds Expectations (3.000 pts)
Meets Expectations (2.000 pts)
Emerging (1.000 pt)
Does Not Meet Expectations (0.000 pt)
- F. Critical Thinking
(1.000, 4.8%)
INTASC-2013.5.d
Engages learners in critical thinking in local and/or global contexts that
- 1. Fosters problem solving
- 2. Encourages conceptual
connections
- 3. Challenges assumptions
Engages learners in critical thinking that
- 1. Fosters problem solving
- 2. Encourages conceptual
connections
Introduces AND/OR models critical thinking that
- 1. Fosters problem solving
- 2. Encourages conceptual
connections
Does not introduce AND/OR model critical thinking that
- 1. Fosters problem solving
- 2. Encourages conceptual
connections
Question Comments : *Comment Required
Doesn't completely apply to the setting of this classroom.
Exceeds (3.000 pts)
Exceeds Expectations (3.000 pts)
Meets Expectations (2.000 pts)
Emerging (1.000 pt)
Does Not Meet Expectations (0.000 pt)
- G. Checking for Understanding and Adjusting Instruction through Formative Assessment (1.000, 4.8%)
INTASC-2013.8.b
Checks for understanding (whole class/group AND individual learners) during lessons using formative assessment
AND
Differentiates through planned and responsive adjustments (whole class/group and individual learners)
Checks for understanding (whole class/group) during lessons using formative assessment
AND
Differentiates through adjustments to instruction (whole class/group)
Inconsistently checks for
understanding during lessons using formative assessment
AND
Adjusts instruction accordingly, but adjustments may cause additional confusion
Does not check for understanding during lessons using formative assessment
OR
Does not make any adjustments based on learners’ responses
Question Comments : *Comment Required
Through observation and participation in class.
Exceeds (3.000 pts)
Exceeds Expectations (3.000 pts)
Meets Expectations (2.000 pts)
Emerging (1.000 pt)
Does Not Meet Expectations (0.000 pt)
- H. Digital Tools and Resources
(1.000, 4.8%)
CAEP-2013
(rev).1.5
Discusses AND uses a variety of
developmentally appropriate
technologies (digital tools and
resources) that
- 1. Are relevant to learning objectives/
targets of the lesson 2. Engage learners in the
demonstration of knowledge or skills
- 3. Extend learners’ understanding of
concepts
Discusses AND uses developmentally
appropriate technologies (digital tools
and resources) that
- 1. Are relevant to learning objectives/
targets of the lesson
- 2. Engage learners in the
demonstration of knowledge or skills
Discusses developmentally
appropriate technologies (digital tools
and resources) relevant to learning
objectives/ targets of the lesson AND
Technology is not available
One of the following:
- A. Does not use technologies (digital
tools and resources)
AND
Technology is available in the setting OR
- B. Use of technologies is not relevant
to the learning objectives/ targets of
the lesson
OR
- C. Does not discuss technologies
AND
Technology is not available in the
setting
Question Comments : *Comment Required
Teacher chose songs that students enjoyed and wanted to sing in class and for performances.
Exceeds (3.000 pts)
Exceeds Expectations (3.000 pts)
Meets Expectations (2.000 pts)
Emerging (1.000 pt)
Does Not Meet Expectations (0.000 pt)
- I. Safe and Respectful Learning Environment
(1.000, 4.8%)
INTASC-2013.3.d
Actively involves learners to create and manage a safe and respectful learning environment through the use of routines and transitions
AND
Establishes and promotes constructive relationships to equitably engage learners
AND
Uses research-based strategies to maintain learners’ attention (individual and whole group)
Creates and manages a safe and respectful learning environment through the use of routines and transitions
AND
Establishes and promotes constructive relationships to equitably engage learners
AND
Uses research-based strategies to maintain learners’ attention (individual and whole group)
Attempts to create a safe learning environment through the use of routines and transitions
AND/OR
Attempts to establish constructive relationships to engage learners AND/OR
Attempts to use constructive
strategies to maintain learners’ attention (individual and whole group)
Does not create a safe learning environment
OR
Does not establish constructive relationships to engage learners
OR
Does not use constructive strategies to maintain learners’ attention (individual and whole group)
Question Comments : *Comment Required
Students were encouraging of each other to sing in class.
Exceeds (3.000 pts)
Exceeds Expectations (3.000 pts)
Meets Expectations (2.000 pts)
Emerging (1.000 pt)
Does Not Meet Expectations (0.000 pt)
- J. Data- Guided Instruction
(1.000, 4.8%)
CAEP-2013
(rev).2.3
Uses data-informed decisions (trends and patterns) to set short and long term goals for future instruction and assessment
AND
Uses contemporary tools for learner data record-keeping and analysis
Uses data-informed decisions to design instruction and assessment
AND
Uses contemporary tools for learner data record-keeping
Uses minimal data to design
instruction and assessment
Does not use data to design
instruction and assessment
Question Comments : *Comment Required
Doesn't really apply to this particular class.
Exceeds (3.000 pts)
Exceeds Expectations (3.000 pts)
Meets Expectations (2.000 pts)
Emerging (1.000 pt)
Does Not Meet Expectations (0.000 pt)
- K. Feedback to Learners
(1.000, 4.8%)
INTASC-2013.6.d
Provides feedback that
- 1. Enables learners to recognize strengths AND areas for improvement 2. Is comprehensible
- 3. Is descriptive
- 4. Is individualized
AND
Provides timely feedback, guiding learners on how to use feedback to monitor their own progress
Provides feedback that
- 1. Enables learners to recognize strengths OR areas for improvement 2. Is comprehensible
- 3. Is descriptive
AND
Provides timely feedback
Provides minimal feedback that 1. Enables learners to recognize strengths OR areas for improvement
OR
Feedback is provided in a somewhat timely fashion
Does not provide feedback
OR
Feedback does not enable learners to recognize strengths OR areas for improvement
OR
Feedback is not provided in a timely fashion
Question Comments : *Comment Required
Teacher gave immediate feedback during practice in class.
Exceeds (3.000 pts)
Exceeds Expectations (3.000 pts)
Meets Expectations (2.000 pts)
Emerging (1.000 pt)
Does Not Meet Expectations (0.000 pt)
- L. Assessment Techniques
(1.000, 4.8%)
INTASC-2013.7.d
Evaluates and supports learning through assessment techniques that are
- 1. Developmentally appropriate 2. Formative AND summative 3. Diagnostic
- 4. Varied
Evaluates and supports learning through assessment techniques that are
- 1. Developmentally appropriate 2. Formative AND summative
Assessment techniques are
- 1. Developmentally appropriate 2. Formative OR summative
Assessment techniques are
- 1. Developmentally inappropriate OR
Not used
Question Comments : *Comment Required
Final performance.
Exceeds (3.000 pts)
Exceeds Expectations (3.000 pts)
Meets Expectations (2.000 pts)
Emerging (1.000 pt)
Does Not Meet Expectations (0.000 pt)
- M. Connections to Research and Theory
(1.000, 4.8%)
CAEP-2013
(rev).1.2
Discusses, provides evidence of, and justifies connections to educational research and/or theory
AND
Uses research and/or theory to explain their P-12 learners’ progress
Discusses and provides evidence of connections to educational research and/or theory
Mentions connections to educational research and/or theory
No connections OR inaccurate connections to educational research and/or theory
Question Comments : *Comment Required
Included in plans.
Exceeds (3.000 pts)
Exceeds Expectations (3.000 pts)
Meets Expectations (2.000 pts)
Emerging (1.000 pt)
Does Not Meet Expectations (0.000 pt)
- N. Participates in Professional Development
(1.000, 4.8%)
Participates in at least one
professional development opportunity (e.g. workshops, seminars, attending a professional conference, joining a professional organization)
AND
Provides evidence of an increased understanding of the teaching profession as a result of the PD
AND
Reflects on own professional practice with evidence of application of the knowledge acquired from PD during student teaching
Participates in at least one
professional development opportunity (e.g. workshop, seminar, attending a professional conference)
AND
Provides evidence of an increased understanding of the teaching profession as a result of the PD
Participates in at least one
professional development opportunity (e.g. workshop, seminar, attending a professional conference)
Does not participate in any
professional development opportunity (e.g. workshop, seminar, attending a professional conference)
Question Comments : *Comment Required
Worked well with members of the school and mentor teacher.
Exceeds (3.000 pts)
Exceeds Expectations (3.000 pts)
Meets Expectations (2.000 pts)
Emerging (1.000 pt)
Does Not Meet Expectations (0.000 pt)
- O. Demonstrates Effective Communication with Parents or Legal Guardians
(1.000, 4.8%)
INTASC-2013.10.d
Provides evidence of communication with parents or legal guardians in accordance with district policies (e.g., letter of introduction, attends parent teacher conferences, communication via email or online)
AND
Provides information about P-12 learning to parents or legal guardians to promote understanding and academic progress
AND
Interacts with parents or legal
guardians in ways that improve understanding and encourage progress (e.g. exchange of email, face-to-face discussion, etc.)
Provides evidence of communication with parents or legal guardians in accordance with district policies (e.g., letter of introduction, attends parent teacher conferences, communication via email or online)
AND
Provides information about P-12 learning to parents or legal guardians to promote understanding and academic progress
Provides evidence of communication with parents or legal guardians in accordance with district policies (e.g., letter of introduction, attends parent teacher conferences, communication via email or online)
Does not provide evidence of
communication with parents or legal guardians
Question Comments : *Comment Required
Assisted in updating grades as needed.
Exceeds (3.000 pts)
Exceeds Expectations (3.000 pts)
Meets Expectations (2.000 pts)
Emerging (1.000 pt)
Does Not Meet Expectations (0.000 pt)
- P. Demonstrates Punctuality
(1.000, 4.8%)
INTASC-2013.9.o
Reports on time or early for daily
student teaching AND Additional teacher engagements (e.g.,
IEPs, teacher committees)
Reports on time for daily student
teaching
AND Additional teacher engagements (e.g.,
IEPs, teacher committees)
Inconsistently reports on time for daily
student teaching
AND/OR Additional teacher engagements (e.g.,
IEPs, teacher committees)
Does not report on time for student
teaching
AND/OR Additional teacher engagements (e.g.,
IEPs, teacher committees)
Question Comments : *Comment Required
Student teacher was always on time and present. Completed duties as assigned with mentor teacher.
Exceeds (3.000 pts)
Exceeds Expectations (3.000 pts)
Meets Expectations (2.000 pts)
Emerging (1.000 pt)
Does Not Meet Expectations (0.000 pt)
- Q. Meets Deadlines and Obligations
(1.000, 4.8%)
INTASC-2013.9.o
Meets deadlines and obligations established by the cooperating teacher and/or supervisor
AND
Informs all stakeholders (cooperating teacher, supervisor, and/or faculty members) of absences prior to the absence
AND
Provides clear and complete
directions and lessons for substitutes without reminders
Meets deadlines and obligations established by the cooperating teacher and/or supervisor
AND
Informs all stakeholders (cooperating teacher, supervisor, and/or faculty members) of absences prior to the absence
AND
Provides clear and complete
directions and lessons for substitutes
Most of the time meets deadlines and obligations established by the cooperating teacher and/or supervisor
AND
Informs some stakeholders
(cooperating teacher, supervisor, and/or faculty members) of absences prior to the absence
AND
Provides incomplete directions and lessons for substitutes
Frequently misses deadlines or obligations established by the cooperating teacher and/or supervisor
AND/OR
Does not inform stakeholders (cooperating teacher, supervisor, and/or faculty members) of absences prior to the absence
AND/OR
Does not provide directions and lessons for substitutes
Question Comments : *Comment Required
Completed duties as assigned with the mentor teacher.
Exceeds (3.000 pts)
Exceeds Expectations (3.000 pts)
Meets Expectations (2.000 pts)
Emerging (1.000 pt)
Does Not Meet Expectations (0.000 pt)
- R. Preparation
(1.000, 4.8%)
INTASC-2013.3.d
Prepared to teach on a daily basis with all materials (lesson plans, manipulatives, handouts, resources, etc.)
AND
Materials are easily accessible AND organized
AND
Prepared for the unexpected and flexible
Prepared to teach on a daily basis with all materials (lesson plans, manipulatives, handouts, resources, etc.)
AND
Materials are easily accessible AND organized
Not consistently prepared to teach on a daily basis with all materials (lesson plans, manipulatives, handouts, resources, etc.)
AND/OR
Materials are easily accessible OR organized
Not prepared to teach on a daily basis with all materials (lesson plans, manipulatives, handouts, resources, etc.)
AND/OR
Materials are not organized NOR easily accessible
Question Comments : *Comment Required
No issues.
Exceeds (3.000 pts)
Exceeds Expectations (3.000 pts)
Meets Expectations (2.000 pts)
Emerging (1.000 pt)
Does Not Meet Expectations (0.000 pt)
- S. Collaboration
(1.000, 4.8%)
INTASC-2013.10.b
Demonstrates collaborative
relationships with cooperating teacher AND/OR members of the school community (other teachers, school personnel, administrators, etc.)
AND
Works with and learns from
colleagues in planning and
implementing instruction to meet diverse needs of learners
Demonstrates collaborative
relationships with cooperating teacher AND/OR members of the school community (other teachers, school personnel, administrators, etc.)
AND
Attempts to work with and learn from colleagues in planning and
implementing instruction
Demonstrates collaborative
relationships with cooperating teacher AND/OR members of the school community (other teachers, school personnel, administrators, etc.)
Does not demonstrate collaborative relationships with cooperating teacher AND/OR members of the school community (other teachers, school personnel, administrators, etc.)
Question Comments : *Comment Required
Worked well with mentor teacher.
Exceeds (3.000 pts)
Exceeds Expectations (3.000 pts)
Meets Expectations (2.000 pts)
Emerging (1.000 pt)
Does Not Meet Expectations (0.000 pt)
- T. Advocacy to Meet the Needs of Learners or for the Teaching Profession
(1.000, 4.8%)
INTASC-2013.10.j
Recognizes and articulates specific areas in need of advocacy, including the
- 1. Needs of learners (e.g. academic, physical, social, emotional, and cultural needs; OR adequate resources, equitable opportunities) OR
- 2. Needs of the teaching profession (e.g. technology integration, research based practices)
AND
Takes action(s) based upon identified needs, while following district
protocols
Recognizes and articulates specific areas in need of advocacy, including the
- 1. Needs of learners (e.g. academic, physical, social, emotional, and cultural needs; OR adequate
resources, equitable opportunities) OR
- 2. Needs of the teaching profession (e.g. technology integration, research based practices)
Recognizes areas in need of
advocacy, but cannot articulate the 1. Needs of learners (e.g. academic, physical, social, emotional, and cultural needs; OR adequate resources, equitable opportunities) OR
- 2. Needs of the teaching profession (e.g. technology integration, research based practices)
Does not recognize areas in need of advocacy, including the
- 1. Needs of learners (e.g. academic, physical, social, emotional, and cultural needs; OR adequate
resources, equitable opportunities) OR
- 2. Needs of the teaching profession (e.g. technology integration, research based practices)
Question Comments : *Comment Required
Followed all school rules and guidelines.
Exceeds (3.000 pts)
Exceeds Expectations (3.000 pts)
Meets Expectations (2.000 pts)
Emerging (1.000 pt)
Does Not Meet Expectations (0.000 pt)
- U. Responds Positively to Feedback and Constructive Criticism
(1.000, 4.8%)
INTASC-2013.9.n
Is receptive to feedback, constructive criticism, supervision, and responds professionally
AND
Incorporates feedback (e.g., from co
NAFME Membership
Please review your home and work address information, and update if needed, so that we can
better serve you.
To renew, click “Memberships/Print Membership Confirmation” in the left sidebar.
Memberships/Print Membership
Confirmation 0
Arlene Lemley
anlemley@liberty.edu
Active
Collegiate National Membership
Membership Number: 003075575
Term Start Date: 9/4/2022
Term End Date: 6/30/2023
Paid Through Date: 6/30/2023
Virginia (VMEA) (Collegiate)
Same information as Collegiate National Membership
Manage Renew
Let's Chat
Let's Chat
Christian Educators Membership
Your membership is currently active. Details Membership History Current Membership Your Membership is currently active. Membership College Student Start Date 02/10/2022 Membership History Membership Start Date End Date 02/09/2023 End Date CollegeNAFME Membership and Christian Educators membership.
Cumulative log of some of the practicum experiences and student teaching experiences.
The fifth-grade students played Orff instruments and Recorders. The 2nd graders were taught how to play the hand drums. She had the 2nd graders to sit in a circle and she told them to leave the drums on the floor like the drums were a soup bowl and most of the kids followed the rule however there was a couple who did not follow the rule and she had to tell them what to do again. They enjoyed playing the drums.
I taught first-grade students how to count quarter notes and the kids danced to a song about Thanksgiving. Later students in fifth grade practiced for their Christmas concert.
Students in the high school choir practiced sight reading and then they watched a video of their concert that they performed the previous week. The students seemed to enjoy watching their performance and they critiqued themselves on how good they did and discussed what they needed to work on. Middle school students were learning to read notes on the staff. The students did an activity on their laptops where they had to label the notes on the staff.
Students in fifth grade were learning how to play Orff instruments. Fourth and fifth-grade students on Fridays would get to sing in the choir and they practiced their music for their concert. The class is very large. The students seem to really enjoy singing in the choir.
High school choir students started learning music for their Christmas concert. Students started learning how to sing Carol of the Bells. The choir is starting to learn to sing in four-part harmonies they have sung in three parts but they have not tried four-part harmonies, so Carol of the Bells is a little difficult for them. Students in the choir are getting better at singing Carol of the Bells. Students are learning to sing Winter Wonderland.
Middle School students are learning about the music of the 50s. They are familiar with a few of the songs. Middle School students are starting to learn about the music of the 60s. They like it when they get to learn about music that they already know, and some students like to dance to the music that they know.

SHARE