Profile Photo

Arlene Nicole Lemley

Address: 78 twp rd 1514 Proctorville Ohio 45669
Phone: 3042086107
Email: anlemley@liberty.edu
My Social:

Expand All
Resume & CV: Arlene Nicole Lemley
Resume

Arlene Lemley

Proctorville, Ohio | (304) 208-6107 | anlemley@liberty.edu|

 

 

PROFESSIONAL SKILLS

  • Taught pre-k- through age 12 for 7 years at Kinderkare.
  • Choir leader for teens church choir for 2 years.
  • Communicating with staff and collaborating with staff and the community.
  • Broad knowledge of vocal techniques and choreography.

EDUCATION

Music Education Choral, Liberty University, Lynchburg, VA    Anticipated May 2024  

  • Practicum experience: 2 30-hour practicums and 2 15-hour practicums.
  • Voice lessons for 8 years.
  • Instrumental techniques classes: Woodwind, guitar, string.
  • 4 piano classes and 2 years of private lessons.
  • Theory and aural skills classes.
  • Improvisational techniques class.

LEADERSHIP EXPERIENCE:

  • Choir leader for teens choir at church for 2 years.

ADDITIONAL EXPERIENCE

Kinderkare, Proctorville, Ohio                                                                                                             May 19, 2015-Present

  • Kinderkare teacher, Worked with 2–12-year-olds for 6 years.
  • Taught music, and dance to students.
  • Assisted kinderkare choral concerts for Christmas and graduation.
  • Watch and teach children.
  • Taught dance classes for children ages 6-12.
  • Taught bucket drum lessons for ages 6-10.
  • Taught ages 6-10 about instruments, and beginner music theory.
  • Worked with students with disabilities ages 2-12. Experience with students with Cyrebral palsy, Autism, ADHD, hearing problems, eye problems.

COMMUNITY SERVICE

TRBC choir, Lynchburg, VA                                                                                                    January 2022-April 2023

  • Sing in The TRBC choir, helped people get on and off the stage. – served 60 hours

Lead teen church choir. Proctorville, OH                                                                                         August 2018-March 2020

  • Picked music for teens to perform.
  • Taught teens skits, and dance,
  • Lead 3 successful performances.

Underwood Senior Center, Huntington, WV

  • Helped make food, check people in,
  • participate in activities such as singing and dancing.
  • helped serve food

 

Resume (.docx) 0.03mb
Teaching Philosophy: Arlene Nicole Lemley
Teaching Philosophy

                                                            Child-Centered Education

                                                                     Arlene Lemley

                                                                      EDUC-360

                                                                     March 6, 2023

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Students Learn in different ways so students should have the opportunity to learn in multiple ways since no child is the same. Teachers should make their lesson plans around the ways that the children in their classroom learn. Students should be able to take what they already know and build upon their learning. However, students should be able to learn by watching and listening to their teacher as well. No child is the same and the lessons should not be taught in just one way but the lessons should be taught in multiple ways to help each individual student.  Students should be engaged in the lesson and having fun while learning so they can become a well rounded adult in the future.

Learning should be child centered. Children should be able to learn in the ways that they learn the best. Education is about teaching the individual and students should not have to learn the same way because everyone is different. God made each of us different and gave each of us different gifts and talents which we are supposed to use to help and teach each other. Psalm 139:15-16 says “My frame was not hidden from you when I was being made in secret intricately woven in the depths of the earth your eyes saw the unformed substance in your book were written every one of them, the days that were formed for me, when as yet there was none of them” which is saying that before we were created God knew us and had a plan for us and that we are created with a purpose.

            Some students will struggle learning in a classroom that has all of the students learn the exact same way. A teacher can teach a lesson in multiple different ways to help students who learn differently. Some students learn kinesthetically, while others learn more visually or auditorily. Everyone is different and every one has different ways that help them learn better. Having teachers who teach lessons for different types of learners is important for students because they will be able to learn quicker and have a better understanding of a subject if they learn in a way that works best for them.

            School as an institution for learning is about having children learn to become well rounded adults in the future. Students should go to school to learn how to do math and reading, however; students should also learn how to live in society and how they should act in the community. Children should have the opportunity to learn more than just their subjects in school but also how to use the things that they learn in the classroom in the community.

            The basic nature of the learner is to want to learn and continue to learn more throughout their life. A learning theory I embrace is a constructivists learning theory because Constructivists learning theory is about how people take what they already know, and believe to help them learn something new. Another learning theory I embrace is Existentialism because Children should be able to explore and learn by doing and experiencing the things that they will be learning in the classroom.

            Students would be able to learn in the classroom by being taught in different ways. The teacher could teach the lesson in a way that will help the kinesthetic, visual and auditory learners by having activities for kinesthetic learners that will let them be more hands on and the teacher can teach the lesson with pictures and more visuals for the visual learners and the auditory learners can listen to the lesson. A teacher should come up with different ways to help the children in their classroom learn the lesson. Students should also have the opportunity to move around and be able to explore and have fun while learning in the classroom, and teachers need to come up with fun and exciting activities to help students learn so the students will enjoy learning and want to come to their classes.

Some activities and assignments students could do in the classroom would be allowing students to come up to the board and figuring out and answer to a question and writing it on the board. Another activity students could do would be they could listen to some music and think about where the music is from and then they could learn a dance from that country, so they can have a more kinesthetic learning environment and a better understanding of different countries and their music. Students could do experiments to learn about sound waves in a classroom and they could learn about high and low pitches by watching a video as well as doing experiments with sound in a classroom.

The role of the learner is to listen, observe and then do. The learner should listen to the teacher and observe what the teacher does and then the student should be able to do the assignment or the task like the teacher showed them and explained to them how to do. The role of the teacher in the learning process is to teach the lesson and show the students how to do the assignments by being an example of what the students should be able to do to finish the assignment or activity. The role of the teacher and the role of the learner relate to each other because the teacher should explain and show the students how to do a task or activity and then the students should be able to observe and follow the instructions of the teacher to perform the task or the assignment. The students would not be able to do a task correctly with out the teacher showing the students how to do the task and explaining to the students how to do a task.

Diversity factors that a teacher needs to take into account are language, culture, and religion. Diversity in a classroom can impact lesson design because a student that speaks English as a second language might need more instruction. A student with a different cultural background would act differently than the rest of the class so a teacher could teach the students about different cultures to help the students with a different culture feel more comfortable, and to teach the other students about other cultures so they will be more welcoming to students with a different cultural background. Students can also have different beliefs and religions in a classroom and a teacher can teach about different religious holidays and the history of different religions so the students can learn and feel more comfortable and be more welcoming to students with different religions.

Students should have the chance to learn how they learn best and not just have to learn in one way. Students should be able to explore and enjoy learning in the classroom. Teachers should find creative ways to teach the different students that they will have in their classroom and they should be able to create lessons that the students will find fun exciting and educational. The teacher should be able to teach a variety of different students and should be able to teach students that have different backgrounds. Students should be able to learn their subjects in school but they should also learn how to become well rounded individuals so they can become well rounded adults in the future.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Licenses & Certifications: Arlene Nicole Lemley
Music Praxis test scores
Score Report Music Praxis (.pdf) 0.34mb
Teaching Experience: Arlene Nicole Lemley
Field Experience Summary

Field Experience Summary: COMPREHENSIVE (PreK-12) Endorsements (Health and Physical Education, Music, Spanish, TESL, Theatre Arts, Visual Arts)

§ List all field experiences on this Field Experience Summary (FES) that you completed in your endorsement area through practicums and student teaching. Refer to the Field Experience Rubric below to review target goals for placement expectations.

§ Although not required, you may also list experiences related to service in actual elementary schools (i.e., after-school tutoring programs, substitute teaching, etc.) on this FES under the section labeled “Previous Experiences”. 

§ You may use your resume and portfolio to highlight all of your other experience with children (i.e., teaching Sunday school, summer camps, etc.), but those experiences should not be included on this FES.

Teacher Candidate:   Arlene Lemley

LU ID:  L32057575

LU Email: anlemley@liberty.edu 

 

Hours

Indirect vs. Direct

 

Placement Description

.

Course

Indicate N/A if not course-based experience

Date(s)

Indirect Observe

 

Direct Teach/

Assist

School Name/Location

Age/Grade/

Subject Area

Christian, Private, or Public School

Cultural Diversity

Exceptionalities

Ethnicity

SES

Gender

Language

Urban

Rural

Other

Learning Disability

Autism

Emotional Disturbance

Intellectual Disability

Other Health Impairment

Developmental Delay

Multiple Disabilities

Traumatic Brain Injury

Other

EXAMPLE

EDUC 588

01/27/2021-05/14/2021

44

1

Linkhorne Elementary School (Lynchburg, VA)

1st Grade

All Subjects

Public

X

X

X

 

X

 

 

X

 

 

 

 

X

 

 

 

EDUC 189-001

10/23/2022

01/16/2023

29

1

Mt.Airy Elementary School

K-5th

Public

X

 

X

X

 

X

 

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MUSC

491-001

10/24/2022

01/31/2023

16

0

William Byrd Middle School

6th-12th

Public

X

 

X

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

EDUC

389-001

03/19/2023

06/12/2023

29

1

Altavista Elementary School

k-5th

Public

X

 

X

 

X

 

 

X

X

 

 

 

X

 

 

 

MUSC

438-001

02/12/2023

06/12/2023

15

0

Altavista Elementary School

k-5th

Public

X

 

X

 

X

 

 

X

X

 

 

 

X

 

 

 

Student Teaching Semester [Example: EDST 460]

EDST

462-004

08/21/2024

10/25/2024

127

113

Fairland High School

6-12th

Public

X

 

X

 

 

X

 

X

X

 

 

 

X

X

 

 

EDST

475-005

10/28/2024

12/13/2024

91

57

Chesapeake Elementary School

K-4th

Public

X

 

X

 

X

 

 

X

X

 

 

 

X

X

 

 

TOTAL HOURS

307

172

Minimum of 150 direct teaching hours must be included.

Previous Experiences

Date(s)

Position/Role Held during Previous Experience

(Substitute, IA/TA, paraprofessional, etc.)

School Name/Location

Age/Grade/

Subject Area

Christian, Private, or Public School

Cultural Diversity

Exceptionalities

Ethnicity

SES

Gender

Language

Urban

Rural

Other

Learning Disability

Autism

Emotional Disturbance

Intellectual Disability

Other Health Impairment

Developmental Delay

Multiple Disabilities

Traumatic Brain Injury

Other

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Professional Organization Memberships

Name of Organization

See recommended organizations

Initial Membership

Renewal Date

Month

Year

Month

Year

NAFME

September

2022

June

2023

VMEA

September

2022

June

2023

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                                     

 

Field Experience Summary: Comprehensive (preK-12) Endorsements (Health and Physical Education, Music, Spanish, TESL, Theatre Arts, Visual Arts)

Use this Field Experience Rubric as a guide in seeking diverse field experiences throughout your program.  Your University Supervisor will use this rubric to evaluate your FES during your student teaching semester. Membership and participation in professional organization(s) is also expected.  Current membership (valid through the end of the student teaching semester) is required in an organization for your endorsement area (e.g., PDK, KDP, ILA, NAEYC, NMSA, CEC, ASU, CEAI, other state and local organizations, etc.)

Teacher Candidate:   Arlene Lemley

LU ID: L32057575

CAEP

InTASC

Setting

Recommended

Required

R1.1, R1.3, R2.3

1, 3, 7

Christian School

One or more field experiences in a Christian school setting (must be an in-person visit).

One field experience in a Christian school setting (may be virtual if an in-person visit is not available.)

R1.1, R1.3, R2.3

3, 7, 8

Public School

Two or more field experiences in public school setting.

One field experience in public school setting.

R1.1, R2.3

1, 2, 3

Cultural diversity

(ethnicity, SES, gender, language, urban, rural, etc.)

Combined field experiences include placements with comprehensive (PreK-12) students who represent three or more types of cultural diversity.

Combined field experiences include placements with comprehensive (PreK-12) students who represent two types of cultural diversity.

R1.1, R1.3, R2.3

1, 2, 8

Exceptionalities:  (learning disability, autism, emotional disturbance, intellectual disability, other health impairment, developmental delay, multiple disabilities, traumatic brain injury, etc.)

Combined field experiences include placements with comprehensive (PreK-12) students who represent three or more types of exceptionalities.

Combined field experiences include placements with comprehensive (PreK-12) students who represent two types of exceptionalities.

R1.2, R2.3

5, 7

Grades PreK-6

 

Two or more field experiences in grades preK-6.  

One field experience in grades preK-6.

 

R1.2, R2.3

5, 7

Grades 6-12

 

Two or more field experiences in grades 6-12.

(experiences in both 6-8 and 9-12 strongly recommended)

One field experience in grades 6-12.

(experiences in both 6-8 and 9-12 strongly recommended)

R1.4, R3.2

9, 10

Professional Organizations

Two or more current memberships (valid through the end of the student teaching semester) in an educational professional organization.

One current membership (valid through the end of the student teaching semester) in an educational professional organization. (eg. CEAI membership)

R1.3, R2.3

7, 8

Student Teaching

Successfully completed all required weeks of student teaching with more than 150 direct teaching hours.

Successfully completed all required weeks of student teaching with 150 direct teaching hours.

 

FES_Comprehensive_(prek-12)Final (.docx) 0.03mb
Reviews & Evaluations: Arlene Nicole Lemley
Evaluations

PRE CPAST from two practicum experiences and a final observation from student teaching.



Placement Details

Intern:Arlene LemleySupervisor(s):Michele WorleyMentor(s):Kelli HessCourse-Section:EDUC 189-Section 001

Pre-CPAST Assignment 05-22 Create PDF

Assessor:

Kelli Hess

 

Comments and Feedback:

Suggested Letter Grade Rubric Directions

Please provide a suggested letter grade to signify the candidate's overall performance and effort in the placement.

 

Rubric Criteria             Rating Comment        Standards

Suggested Letter Grade Rubric         Please provide a suggested letter grade to signify the candidate's overall performance and effort during the practicum. 3.000-B                          

3.000 pts | 75 %

Pre-CPAST Directions

Directions – The form will be used once during the course of the term and will be provided by the Program Coordinator to the University Supervisor, Host Teacher, and Candidate.

 

Additional information about and support for using the form can be found in the “Glossary” and “Look Fors” for select rows (indicated by an *) at the end of this document

 

Glossary of Terms

Glossary of Terms

 

Analysis: Careful and critical examination of data and/or processes to identify key components and potential outcomes.

 

Assessment: “Process of monitoring, measuring, evaluating, documenting, reflecting on, and adjusting teaching and relearning to ensure that learners reach high levels of Achievement

 

Candidate: (Also known as "intern") An individual participating in a full-time field experience in a P12 classroom in order to obtain professional education licensure/certification.

 

Cooperating Teachers: (Also known as “mentor teachers”) Teachers in schools who mentor and supervise student teachers in their classrooms for the duration of a student teaching and/or field experience.

 

Data-informed decisions:  “Focuses on using student assessment data and relevant background information to inform decisions related to planning and implementing instructional strategies at the district, school, classroom, and individual student levels.”

 

Developmental Theory (General): Theories that describe the stages of development of children/adolescents (e.g., Erikson’s Theory of Psychosocial Development, Kohlberg’s Theory of Moral Development, Piaget’s Cognitive Development Theory, Behavioral Theories, and Sociocultural Theories).

 

Developmental Theory (Content-Specific):  Content-specific teaching that organizes activities and learning tasks to help learners move from one level to the next.

 

Evidence: Artifacts that document and demonstrate how [the student teacher] planned and implemented instruction

 

Feedback: “Information communicated to the learner that is intended to modify the learner’s thinking or behavior for the purpose of improving learning.”

 

Formative Assessment: “Assessment used continuously throughout learning and teaching, allowing teachers to adjust instruction to improve learner achievement.”1

 

Goals: See definition for “Measurable Goals.”

 

Learner: Any P12 student in the student teacher’s classroom.

 

Learning Environment: Any setting where learning occurs. The term may refer to the physical environment (e.g., the classroom), as well as the classroom management procedures and activities that enable teaching and learning to take place.

 

Measurable Goals: “Provides information for describing, assessing, and evaluating student achievement.”

 

Mentor Teachers: See definition for “Cooperating Teachers.”

 

Objectives/Targets: P12 student (learner) learning outcomes to be achieved by the end of the lesson or learning segment.

 

Problem Solving: A mental process that involves discovering, analyzing, and solving problems. The ultimate goal of problem-solving is to overcome obstacles and find a solution that best resolves the issue.

 

Program Coordinator: Faculty or staff member from a college or university who coordinates/manages the administrative components of a teacher educator licensure program.

 

Research: "The use of rigorous, systematic, and objective methodologies to obtain reliable and valid knowledge."

 

Targets: See definition for 'Objectives/Targets.'

 

University Supervisor (US): The university instructor assigned to the student teacher who regularly observes his/her performance to provide feedback on strengths and weaknesses. The US coordinates the student teacher’s evaluation, and is responsible for recording the consensus scores using this form.

 

Rubric Criteria             Rating Comment        Standards

Pre-CPAST Evaluation Rubric             A. Focus for Learning: Standards and Objectives/Targets  1.000-Emerging                        INTASC-2013.7.a, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.3

  1. B. Assessment of P-12 Learning 2.000-Meets Expectations               INTASC-2013.6.b, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.3
  2. C. Learning Target and Directions 2.000-Meets Expectations               INTASC-2013.7.c, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.3
  3. D. Checking for Understanding and Adjusting Instruction through Formative Assessment 2.000-Meets Expectations               INTASC-2013.8.b, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.3
  4. E. Digital Tools and Resources 2.000-Meets Expectations               INTASC.6.I, INTASC.5.L, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.2
  5. F. Safe and Respectful Learning Environment 2.000-Meets Expectations INTASC-2013.3.d, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.1
  6. G. Data-Guided Instruction 2.000-Meets Expectations               INTASC.6.I, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.3
  7. H. Feedback to Learners 1.000-Emerging INTASC-2013.6.d, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.3
  8. I. Assessment Techniques 1.000-Emerging INTASC-2013.7.d, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.3
  9. J. Connections to Research and Theory N/A CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.1
  10. K. Demonstrates Punctuality 2.000-Meets Expectations               INTASC-2013.9.o, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.4
  11. L. Meets Deadlines and Obligations 2.000-Meets Expectations INTASC-2013.9.o, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.4
  12. M. Collaboration 2.000-Meets Expectations INTASC-2013.10.b, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.4
  13. N. Responds Positively to Feedback and Constructive Criticism 2.000-Meets Expectations INTASC-2013.9.n, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.4

23.000 pts | 88.46 %

Rubric Criteria             Rating Comment        Standards

Setting              School Setting (This section's scoring will not affect the student's overall score. The point values are for reporting purposes only.)            0.000-Rural                  

0.000 pts

Rubric Criteria             Rating Comment        Standards

Method of Instructional Delivery      Method of Instructional Delivery (This section's scoring will not affect the student's overall score. The point values are for reporting purposes only.)  1.000-In Person Only                 

1.000 pts | 33.33 %

Directions for Pre-SCRIP Dispositions Assessment Rubric

Dear Host Teacher, Cooperating Teacher, or On-site Mentor,

 

Before completing the SCRIP/Pre-SCRIP assessment, please review the SCRIP/Pre-SCRIP Scorer Training video. This video will explain the importance of this assessment and will provide direction on how to accurately score the candidate using the instrument. The video is less than 15 minutes in length. Here is the link: https://watch.liberty.edu/media/t/1_gvd5n0i1

 

Also attached is a copy of the PowerPoint used in the video in case you would like to refer back to the slides after watching the training. Thank you so much for investing in the training and preparation of future educators!

 

Rubric Criteria             Rating Comment        Standards

Pre-SCRIP Dispositions Assessment Rubric            Social Responsibility Cross-Cutting Theme: Diversity      2.000-Level 2: Met- Proficient                           INTASC-2013.10, INTASC-2013.6, INTASC-2013.7, INTASC-2013.2, INTASC-2013.3, NASDTEC-MCEE-2015.1, NASDTEC-MCEE-2015.3, NASDTEC-MCEE-2015.2, NASDTEC-MCEE-2015.5, NASDTEC-MCEE-2015.4, CAEP-2013 (rev).1.1, CAEP-2013 (rev).1.4, InTASC-2017.2.d, CAEP-2013 (rev).CCT-Diversity, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.4

Commitment 2.000-Level 2: Met- Proficient                          INTASC-2013.10, INTASC-2013.6, INTASC-2013.7, INTASC-2013.9, INTASC-2013.2, INTASC-2013.1, INTASC-2013.9.o, NASDTEC-MCEE-2015.1, NASDTEC-MCEE-2015.2, CAEP-2013 (rev).1.1, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.4

Reflective Practice    0.000-Level 0: Not Met- No Evidence                         INTASC-2013.10, INTASC-2013.6, INTASC-2013.8, INTASC-2013.2, INTASC-2013.3, INTASC-2013.1, INTASC-2013.9.g, NASDTEC-MCEE-2015.3, NASDTEC-MCEE-2015.2, NASDTEC-MCEE-2015.5, NASDTEC-MCEE-2015.4, CAEP-2013 (rev).1.1, CAEP-2013 (rev).1.2, ISTE-2017.7, CAEP-2013 (rev).1.3, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.4

Integrity            2.000-Level 2: Met- Proficient                          INTASC-2013.10, INTASC-2013.7, INTASC-2013.9, INTASC-2013.5, INTASC-2013.1, NASDTEC-MCEE-2015.1, NASDTEC-MCEE-2015.3, NASDTEC-MCEE-2015.2, NASDTEC-MCEE-2015.4, CAEP-2013 (rev).1.1, ISTE-2017.3, InTASC-2017.9.m, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.4

Professionalism          2.000-Level 2: Met- Proficient                         INTASC-2013.10, INTASC-2013.6, INTASC-2013.7, INTASC-2013.9, INTASC-2013.2, INTASC-2013.1, NASDTEC-MCEE-2015.1, NASDTEC-MCEE-2015.3, NASDTEC-MCEE-2015.4, CAEP-2013 (rev).1.1, CAEP-2013 (rev).1.2, InTASC-2017.10.r, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.4

8.000 pts | 80 %

Standards Chart

<<Back

Copyright © 2024 Watermark Insights, LLC and its affiliates. All Rights Reserved. Need Help? Contact support@watermarkinsights.com

 

 

 

 

Placement Details

Intern:Arlene LemleySupervisor(s):Michele WorleyMentor(s):Aimee RosserCourse-Section:EDUC 389-Section 001

Pre-CPAST Assignment 11-22 Create PDF

Assessor:

Aimee Rosser

 

Comments and Feedback:

Pre-CPAST Directions

Directions – The form will be used once during the course of the term and will be provided by the Program Coordinator to the University Supervisor, Host Teacher, and Candidate.

 

Additional information about and support for using the form can be found in the “Glossary” and “Look Fors” for select rows (indicated by an *) at the end of this document

 

Glossary of Terms

Glossary of Terms

 

Analysis: Careful and critical examination of data and/or processes to identify key components and potential outcomes.

 

Assessment: “Process of monitoring, measuring, evaluating, documenting, reflecting on, and adjusting teaching and relearning to ensure that learners reach high levels of Achievement

 

Candidate: (Also known as "intern") An individual participating in a full-time field experience in a P12 classroom in order to obtain professional education licensure/certification.

 

Cooperating Teachers: (Also known as “mentor teachers”) Teachers in schools who mentor and supervise student teachers in their classrooms for the duration of a student teaching and/or field experience.

 

Data-informed decisions:  “Focuses on using student assessment data and relevant background information to inform decisions related to planning and implementing instructional strategies at the district, school, classroom, and individual student levels.”

 

Developmental Theory (General): Theories that describe the stages of development of children/adolescents (e.g., Erikson’s Theory of Psychosocial Development, Kohlberg’s Theory of Moral Development, Piaget’s Cognitive Development Theory, Behavioral Theories, and Sociocultural Theories).

 

Developmental Theory (Content-Specific):  Content-specific teaching that organizes activities and learning tasks to help learners move from one level to the next.

 

Evidence: Artifacts that document and demonstrate how [the student teacher] planned and implemented instruction

 

Feedback: “Information communicated to the learner that is intended to modify the learner’s thinking or behavior for the purpose of improving learning.”

 

Formative Assessment: “Assessment used continuously throughout learning and teaching, allowing teachers to adjust instruction to improve learner achievement.”1

 

Goals: See definition for “Measurable Goals.”

 

Learner: Any P12 student in the student teacher’s classroom.

 

Learning Environment: Any setting where learning occurs. The term may refer to the physical environment (e.g., the classroom), as well as the classroom management procedures and activities that enable teaching and learning to take place.

 

Measurable Goals: “Provides information for describing, assessing, and evaluating student achievement.”

 

Mentor Teachers: See definition for “Cooperating Teachers.”

 

Objectives/Targets: P12 student (learner) learning outcomes to be achieved by the end of the lesson or learning segment.

 

Problem Solving: A mental process that involves discovering, analyzing, and solving problems. The ultimate goal of problem-solving is to overcome obstacles and find a solution that best resolves the issue.

 

Program Coordinator: Faculty or staff member from a college or university who coordinates/manages the administrative components of a teacher educator licensure program.

 

Research: "The use of rigorous, systematic, and objective methodologies to obtain reliable and valid knowledge."

 

Targets: See definition for 'Objectives/Targets.'

 

University Supervisor (US): The university instructor assigned to the student teacher who regularly observes his/her performance to provide feedback on strengths and weaknesses. The US coordinates the student teacher’s evaluation, and is responsible for recording the consensus scores using this form.

 

Suggested Letter Grade Rubric Directions

Please provide a suggested letter grade to signify the candidate's overall performance and effort in the placement.

 

Rubric Criteria             Rating Comment        Standards

Suggested Letter Grade Rubric         Please provide a suggested letter grade to signify the candidate's overall performance and effort during the practicum. 4.000-A             Ms. Lemley was pleasant and professional during her practicum. She was helpful and inquisitive. She seemed a little hesitant at first to participate with the younger students in silly songs and dances, but by the end of the practicum, she appeared to be more comfortable participating in all of the activities. She was always willing to help sing parts and guide students in playing instruments.      

4.000 pts | 100 %

Rubric Criteria             Rating Comment        Standards

Pre-CPAST Evaluation Rubric             A. Focus for Learning: Standards and Objectives/Targets  2.000-Meets Expectations              Ms. Lemley's lesson encouraged creativity and student collaboration, two standards in elementary music.            InTASC-2017.7.a, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.3

  1. B. Assessment of P-12 Learning 2.000-Meets Expectations All students were engaged in the lesson and could be assessed through their participation.  InTASC-2017.6.b, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.3
  2. C. Learning Target and Directions 2.000-Meets Expectations Ms. Lemley clearly stated the goal of the lesson. She guided students in choosing instrument sounds to represent words in a story. She could have gone one step further in listing ahead of time all of the words that would be represented to better organize and help students remember the words for which they were responsible.       InTASC-2017.7.c, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.3
  3. D. Checking for Understanding and Adjusting Instruction through Formative Assessment 2.000-Meets Expectations Ms. Lemley responded and redirected students who were not playing at the correct time.    InTASC-2017.8.b, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.3
  4. E. Digital Tools and Resources 0.000-Does Not Meet Expectations The lesson did not require the use of technology. However, there was an opportunity to incorporate technology to enhance organization and implementation of the students' participation. InTASC-2017.5.l, InTASC-2017.6.i, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.2
  5. F. Safe and Respectful Learning Environment 2.000-Meets Expectations The students were very attentive and respectful to Ms. Lemley. She informed students that she would be calling on those who were sitting quietly to first choose an instrument. If there was any talking or playing out of turn, she addressed it without causing disruption to the lesson.   InTASC-2017.3.d, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.1
  6. G. Data-Guided Instruction 2.000-Meets Expectations Ms. Lemley based her objectives on state and national music standards. She took into account the terminology that she knew the students had been learning.       InTASC-2017.6.l, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.3
  7. H. Feedback to Learners 2.000-Meets Expectations Ms. Lemley made affirmative statements to students who played on cue. She guided students who were not playing at the correct time.    InTASC-2017.6.d, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.3
  8. I. Assessmnt Techniques 1.000-Emerging Ms. Lemley assessed through observation of student participation. She also could have led student discussion after the story about how well different instrument sounds represented the words and why.              InTASC-2017.7.d, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.3
  9. J. Connections to Research and Theory 1.000-Emerging               CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.1
  10. K. Demonstrates Punctuality 2.000-Meets Expectations Ms. Lemley gave advance notice and confirmed it would suit me each time she visited the school. She followed through and was present every time she made plans to be there. If she was ever minutes late, she would stay longer than she had planned to make sure that the hours she recorded were accurate and meaningful.          InTASC-2017.9.o, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.4
  11. L. Meets Deadlines and Obligations 2.000-Meets Expectations InTASC-2017.9.o, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.4
  12. M. Collaboration 2.000-Meets Expectations Ms. Lemley consistently offered to help hand out materials, co-lead in part singing, and help in anyway she could. She even brought her clarinet to demonstrate to students during one of my lessons about orchestral instruments.           InTASC-2017.10.b, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.4
  13. N. Responds Positively to Feedback and Constructive Criticism 2.000-Meets Expectations Ms. Lemley was very receptive to the feedback I gave on her lesson.            InTASC-2017.9.n, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.4

24.000 pts | 85.71 %

Rubric Criteria             Rating Comment        Standards

School Setting             School Setting (This section's scoring will not affect the student's overall score. The point values are for reporting purposes only.)       1.000-Town                  

1.000 pts | 33.33 %

Rubric Criteria             Rating Comment        Standards

Method of Instructional Delivery      Element 1Method of Instructional Delivery (This section's scoring will not affect the student's overall score. The point values are for reporting purposes only.)            1.000-In Person Only              

1.000 pts | 33.33 %

Directions for Pre-SCRIP Dispositions Assessment Rubric

Dear Host Teacher, Cooperating Teacher, or On-site Mentor,

 

Before completing the SCRIP/Pre-SCRIP assessment, please review the SCRIP/Pre-SCRIP Scorer Training video. This video will explain the importance of this assessment and will provide direction on how to accurately score the candidate using the instrument. The video is less than 15 minutes in length. Here is the link: https://watch.liberty.edu/media/t/1_103thmlr

 

Also attached is a copy of the PowerPoint used in the video in case you would like to refer back to the slides after watching the training. Thank you so much for investing in the training and preparation of future educators!

 

Rubric Criteria             Rating Comment        Standards

Pre-SCRIP Dispositions Assessment Rubric            A. Social Responsibility              2.000-Level 2: Met-Proficient                          NASDTEC-MCEE-2015.3, InTASC-2017.9.m, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.4, CAEP-Revised-Advanced-2022.RA1.1f

  1. B. Social Responsibility 2.000-Level 2: Met-Proficient Ms. Lemley reported to me any unsafe behavior she witnessed that required attention. She maintained a positive rapport with the students.    NASDTEC-MCEE-2015.3, InTASC-2017.10.c, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.4, CAEP-Revised-Advanced-2022.RA1.1f
  2. C. Commitment 2.000-Level 2: Met-Proficient               NASDTEC-MCEE-2015.1, InTASC-2017.10.p, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.4, CAEP-Revised-Advanced-2022.RA1.1f
  3. D. Commitment 2.000-Level 2: Met-Proficient Ms. Lemley gave me her lesson plan ahead of time. She arrived at school in ample time to thoughtfully set up the instruments prior to the students entering the classroom.      NASDTEC-MCEE-2015.1, InTASC-2017.9.k, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.4, CAEP-Revised-Advanced-2022.RA1.1f
  4. E. Reflective Practice 2.000-Level 2: Met-Proficient               NASDTEC-MCEE-2015.2, InTASC-2017.9.c, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.4, CAEP-Revised-Advanced-2022.RA1.1f
  5. F. Reflective Practice 2.000-Level 2: Met-Proficient Ms. Lemley asked questions about lessons I taught and made connections to things she had previously experienced or learned. NASDTEC-MCEE-2015.2, InTASC-2017.9.c, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.4, CAEP-Revised-Advanced-2022.RA1.1f
  6. G. Integrity 2.000-Level 2: Met-Proficient               NASDTEC-MCEE-2015.2, InTASC-2017.9.o, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.4, CAEP-Revised-Advanced-2022.RA1.1f
  7. H. Integrity 2.000-Level 2: Met-Proficient               NASDTEC-MCEE-2015.5, InTASC-2017.10.g, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.4, CAEP-Revised-Advanced-2022.RA1.1f, ISTE.2.3, ISTE.LDR.3
  8. I. Professionalism 2.000-Level 2: Met-Proficient               NASDTEC-MCEE-2015.2, InTASC-2017.10.c, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.4, CAEP-Revised-Advanced-2022.RA1.1f
  9. J. Professionalism 2.000-Level 2: Met-Proficient               NASDTEC-MCEE-2015.2, InTASC-2017.9.c, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.4, CAEP-Revised-Advanced-2022.RA1.1f

20.000 pts | 100 %

Standards Chart

 

 

 

nstitution:       Liberty University

Student:           Arlene Lemley

Supervisor:     Tessa Leep

Site:     Fairland High School

Date:   Fall 2024 - Term A (08/19/24 - 12/13/24)

Type:   EDST 462 (OSS_PT1(Onsite Supervisor - Site Supervisor))

Final Completed:        10/24/24 11:58 AM

ST Evaluation Final - Mentor

Section Weight: 0%

CPAST Student Teaching Evaluation Final 

 

 

              Exceeds Expectations (3.000 pts)    Meets Expectations (2.000 pts)       Emerging (1.000 pt)   Does Not Meet Expectations (0.000 pt)

  1. A. Focus for Learning: Standards and Objectives/Targ (1.000,4.8%)INTASC-2013.7.

Plans align to appropriate P-12 state learning standards

 

AND

 

 Goals are measureable

 

AND

 

Standards, objectives/targets, and learning tasks are consistently aligned with each other

 

AND

 

Articulates objectives/targets that are appropriate for learners and attend to appropriate developmental

 

progressions relative to age and content-area

 

Plans align to appropriate P-12 state learning standards

 

AND

 

Goals are measureable

 

AND

 

Standards, objectives/ targets, and learning tasks are consistently alignedwith each other

 

AND

 

Articulates objectives/targets that are appropriate for learners

 

Plans align to appropriate P-12 state learning standards

 

AND/OR

 

Some goals are measureable

 

AND/OR

 

Standards, objectives/targets, and learning tasks, are loosely or are not consistently aligned with each other

 

AND/OR

 

Articulates some objectives/targets that are appropriate for learners

 

Plans do not align to the appropriate P-12 state learning standards

 

AND/OR

 

Goals are absent or not measureable

 

AND/OR

 

Standards, objectives/targets, and learning tasks are not aligned with each other

 

AND/OR

 

Does not articulate objectives/targets that are appropriate for learners

 

 

Question Comments : *Comment Required

Plans were appropriate for the varsity vocal class.

Exceeds (3.000 pts)

             

Exceeds Expectations (3.000 pts)

 

Meets Expectations (2.000 pts)

 

Emerging (1.000 pt)

 

Does Not Meet Expectations (0.000 pt)

 

  1. B. Materials and Resources

 

(1.000, 4.8%)

 

INTASC-2013.7.b

 

Uses a variety of materials and resources that

 

  1. 1. Align with all objectives/targets 2. Make content relevant to learners 3. Encourage individualization of learning

 

Uses a variety of materials and resources that

 

  1. 1. Align with all objectives/targets 2. Make content relevant to learners

 

Uses materials and resources that align with some of the objectives/targets

 

Materials and resources do not align with objectives/targets

 

 

Question Comments : *Comment Required

Materials were appropriate for the class.

Exceeds (3.000 pts)

             

Exceeds Expectations (3.000 pts)

 

Meets Expectations (2.000 pts)

 

Emerging (1.000 pt)

 

Does Not Meet Expectations (0.000 pt)

 

  1. C. Assessment of P-12 Learning

 

(1.000, 4.8%)

 

INTASC-2013.6.b

 

Plans a variety of assessments that 1. Provide opportunities for learners of varying abilities to illustrate

 

competence

 

  1. 2. Align with the appropriate P-12 state learning standards

 

  1. 3. Are culturally relevant and draw from learners’ funds of knowledge 4. Promote learner growth

 

Plans a variety of assessments that 1. Provide opportunities for learners toillustrate competence

 

  1. 2. Align with the appropriate P-12 state learning standards

 

  1. 3. Are culturally relevant and draw from learners’ funds of knowledge

 

Planned assessments

 

  1. 1. Provide opportunities for some learners to illustrate competence

 

  1. 2. Align with the appropriate P-12 state learning standards

 

Planned assessments

 

  1. 1. Are not included

 

OR

 

  1. 2. Do not align with the appropriate P 12 state learning standards

 

 

Question Comments : *Comment Required

Assessments were included in lesson plans.

Exceeds (3.000 pts)

             

Exceeds Expectations (3.000 pts)

 

Meets Expectations (2.000 pts)

 

Emerging (1.000 pt)

 

Does Not Meet Expectations (0.000 pt)

 

  1. D. Differentiated Methods

 

(1.000, 4.8%)

 

INTASC-2013.2.c

 

Lessons make meaningful and culturally relevant connections to 1. Learners’ prior knowledge

 

  1. 2. Previous lessons

 

  1. 3. Future learning

 

  1. 4. Other disciplines and real-world experiences

 

AND

 

Differentiation of instruction supports learner development

 

AND

 

Organizes instruction to ensure content is comprehensible, relevant, and challenging for learners

 

Lessons make clear and coherent connections to

 

  1. 1. Learners’ prior knowledge

 

  1. 2. Previous lessons

 

  1. 3. Future learning

 

AND

 

Differentiation of instruction supports learner development

 

AND

 

Organizes instruction to ensure content is comprehensible and relevant for learners

 

Lessons make an attempt to build on, but are not completely successful at connecting to

 

  1. 1. Learners’ prior knowledge,

 

  1. 2. Previous lessons, OR future learning

 

AND

 

Differentiation of instruction is minimal

 

AND

 

Organizes instruction to ensure content is comprehensible for learners

 

Lessons do not build on or connect to learners’ prior knowledge

 

AND/OR

 

Explanations given are illogical or inaccurate as to how the content connects to previous and future learning

 

AND/OR

 

Differentiation of instruction is absent

 

 

Question Comments : *Comment Required

Plans included all components listed.

Exceeds (3.000 pts)

             

Exceeds Expectations (3.000 pts)

 

Meets Expectations (2.000 pts)

 

Emerging (1.000 pt)

 

Does Not Meet Expectations (0.000 pt)

 

  1. E. Learning Target and Directions

 

(1.000, 4.8%)

 

INTASC-2013.7.c

 

Articulates accurate and coherent learning targets

 

AND

 

Articulates accurate

 

directions/explanations throughout the lesson

 

AND

 

Sequences learning experiences appropriately

 

Articulates an accurate learning target

 

AND

 

Articulates accurate directions/ explanations

 

AND

 

Sequences learning experiences appropriately

 

Articulates an inaccurate learning target

 

AND/OR

 

Articulates inaccurate

 

directions/explanations

 

Does not articulate the learning target

 

OR

 

Does not articulate directions/ explanations

 

 

Question Comments : *Comment Required

Student teacher was clear on expectations and directions in class.

Exceeds (3.000 pts)

             

Exceeds Expectations (3.000 pts)

 

Meets Expectations (2.000 pts)

 

Emerging (1.000 pt)

 

Does Not Meet Expectations (0.000 pt)

 

  1. F. Critical Thinking

 

(1.000, 4.8%)

 

INTASC-2013.5.d

 

Engages learners in critical thinking in local and/or global contexts that

 

  1. 1. Fosters problem solving

 

  1. 2. Encourages conceptual

 

connections

 

  1. 3. Challenges assumptions

 

Engages learners in critical thinking that

 

  1. 1. Fosters problem solving

 

  1. 2. Encourages conceptual

 

connections

 

Introduces AND/OR models critical thinking that

 

  1. 1. Fosters problem solving

 

  1. 2. Encourages conceptual

 

connections

 

Does not introduce AND/OR model critical thinking that

 

  1. 1. Fosters problem solving

 

  1. 2. Encourages conceptual

 

connections

 

 

Question Comments : *Comment Required

Doesn't completely apply to the setting of this classroom.

Exceeds (3.000 pts)

             

Exceeds Expectations (3.000 pts)

 

Meets Expectations (2.000 pts)

 

Emerging (1.000 pt)

 

Does Not Meet Expectations (0.000 pt)

 

  1. G. Checking for Understanding and Adjusting Instruction through Formative Assessment (1.000, 4.8%)

 

INTASC-2013.8.b

 

Checks for understanding (whole class/group AND individual learners) during lessons using formative assessment

 

 

 

AND

 

Differentiates through planned and responsive adjustments (whole class/group and individual learners)

 

Checks for understanding (whole class/group) during lessons using formative assessment

 

AND

 

Differentiates through adjustments to instruction (whole class/group)

 

Inconsistently checks for

 

understanding during lessons using formative assessment

 

AND

 

Adjusts instruction accordingly, but adjustments may cause additional confusion

 

Does not check for understanding during lessons using formative assessment

 

OR

 

Does not make any adjustments based on learners’ responses

 

 

Question Comments : *Comment Required

Through observation and participation in class.

Exceeds (3.000 pts)

             

Exceeds Expectations (3.000 pts)

 

Meets Expectations (2.000 pts)

 

Emerging (1.000 pt)

 

Does Not Meet Expectations (0.000 pt)

 

  1. H. Digital Tools and Resources

(1.000, 4.8%)

CAEP-2013

(rev).1.5           

Discusses AND uses a variety of

developmentally appropriate

technologies (digital tools and

resources) that

  1. 1. Are relevant to learning objectives/

targets of the lesson 2. Engage learners in the

demonstration of knowledge or skills

  1. 3. Extend learners’ understanding of

concepts

 

Discusses AND uses developmentally

appropriate technologies (digital tools

and resources) that

  1. 1. Are relevant to learning objectives/

targets of the lesson

 

  1. 2. Engage learners in the

demonstration of knowledge or skills

 

Discusses developmentally

appropriate technologies (digital tools

and resources) relevant to learning

objectives/ targets of the lesson AND

Technology is not available

 

One of the following:

  1. A. Does not use technologies (digital

tools and resources)

AND

Technology is available in the setting OR

  1. B. Use of technologies is not relevant

to the learning objectives/ targets of

the lesson

OR

  1. C. Does not discuss technologies

AND

Technology is not available in the

setting

 

 

Question Comments : *Comment Required

Teacher chose songs that students enjoyed and wanted to sing in class and for performances.

Exceeds (3.000 pts)

             

Exceeds Expectations (3.000 pts)

 

Meets Expectations (2.000 pts)

 

Emerging (1.000 pt)

 

Does Not Meet Expectations (0.000 pt)

 

  1. I. Safe and Respectful Learning Environment

 

(1.000, 4.8%)

 

INTASC-2013.3.d

 

Actively involves learners to create and manage a safe and respectful learning environment through the use of routines and transitions

 

AND

 

Establishes and promotes constructive relationships to equitably engage learners

 

AND

 

Uses research-based strategies to maintain learners’ attention (individual and whole group)

 

Creates and manages a safe and respectful learning environment through the use of routines and transitions

 

AND

 

Establishes and promotes constructive relationships to equitably engage learners

 

AND

 

Uses research-based strategies to maintain learners’ attention (individual and whole group)

 

Attempts to create a safe learning environment through the use of routines and transitions

 

AND/OR

 

Attempts to establish constructive relationships to engage learners AND/OR

 

Attempts to use constructive

 

strategies to maintain learners’ attention (individual and whole group)

 

Does not create a safe learning environment

 

OR

 

Does not establish constructive relationships to engage learners

 

OR

 

Does not use constructive strategies to maintain learners’ attention (individual and whole group)

 

 

Question Comments : *Comment Required

Students were encouraging of each other to sing in class.

Exceeds (3.000 pts)

             

Exceeds Expectations (3.000 pts)

 

Meets Expectations (2.000 pts)

 

Emerging (1.000 pt)

 

Does Not Meet Expectations (0.000 pt)

 

  1. J. Data- Guided Instruction

 

(1.000, 4.8%)

 

CAEP-2013

 

(rev).2.3

 

Uses data-informed decisions (trends and patterns) to set short and long term goals for future instruction and assessment

 

AND

 

Uses contemporary tools for learner data record-keeping and analysis

 

Uses data-informed decisions to design instruction and assessment

 

AND

 

Uses contemporary tools for learner data record-keeping

 

Uses minimal data to design

 

instruction and assessment

 

Does not use data to design

 

instruction and assessment

 

 

Question Comments : *Comment Required

Doesn't really apply to this particular class.

Exceeds (3.000 pts)

             

Exceeds Expectations (3.000 pts)

 

Meets Expectations (2.000 pts)

 

Emerging (1.000 pt)

 

Does Not Meet Expectations (0.000 pt)

 

  1. K. Feedback to Learners

 

(1.000, 4.8%)

 

INTASC-2013.6.d

 

Provides feedback that

 

  1. 1. Enables learners to recognize strengths AND areas for improvement 2. Is comprehensible

 

  1. 3. Is descriptive

 

  1. 4. Is individualized

 

AND

 

Provides timely feedback, guiding learners on how to use feedback to monitor their own progress

 

Provides feedback that

 

  1. 1. Enables learners to recognize strengths OR areas for improvement 2. Is comprehensible

 

  1. 3. Is descriptive

 

AND

 

Provides timely feedback

 

Provides minimal feedback that 1. Enables learners to recognize strengths OR areas for improvement

 

OR

 

Feedback is provided in a somewhat timely fashion

 

Does not provide feedback

 

OR

 

Feedback does not enable learners to recognize strengths OR areas for improvement

 

OR

 

Feedback is not provided in a timely fashion

 

 

Question Comments : *Comment Required

Teacher gave immediate feedback during practice in class.

Exceeds (3.000 pts)

             

Exceeds Expectations (3.000 pts)

 

Meets Expectations (2.000 pts)

 

Emerging (1.000 pt)

 

Does Not Meet Expectations (0.000 pt)

 

  1. L. Assessment Techniques

 

(1.000, 4.8%)

 

INTASC-2013.7.d

 

Evaluates and supports learning through assessment techniques that are

 

  1. 1. Developmentally appropriate 2. Formative AND summative 3. Diagnostic

 

  1. 4. Varied

 

Evaluates and supports learning through assessment techniques that are

 

  1. 1. Developmentally appropriate 2. Formative AND summative

 

Assessment techniques are

 

  1. 1. Developmentally appropriate 2. Formative OR summative

 

Assessment techniques are

 

  1. 1. Developmentally inappropriate OR

 

Not used

 

 

Question Comments : *Comment Required

Final performance.

Exceeds (3.000 pts)

             

Exceeds Expectations (3.000 pts)

 

Meets Expectations (2.000 pts)

 

Emerging (1.000 pt)

 

Does Not Meet Expectations (0.000 pt)

 

  1. M. Connections to Research and Theory

 

(1.000, 4.8%)

 

CAEP-2013

 

(rev).1.2

 

Discusses, provides evidence of, and justifies connections to educational research and/or theory

 

AND

 

Uses research and/or theory to explain their P-12 learners’ progress

 

Discusses and provides evidence of connections to educational research and/or theory

 

Mentions connections to educational research and/or theory

 

No connections OR inaccurate connections to educational research and/or theory

 

 

Question Comments : *Comment Required

Included in plans.

Exceeds (3.000 pts)

             

Exceeds Expectations (3.000 pts)

 

Meets Expectations (2.000 pts)

 

Emerging (1.000 pt)

 

Does Not Meet Expectations (0.000 pt)

 

  1. N. Participates in Professional Development

 

(1.000, 4.8%)

 

Participates in at least one

 

professional development opportunity (e.g. workshops, seminars, attending a professional conference, joining a professional organization)

 

AND

 

Provides evidence of an increased understanding of the teaching profession as a result of the PD

 

AND

 

Reflects on own professional practice with evidence of application of the knowledge acquired from PD during student teaching

 

Participates in at least one

 

professional development opportunity (e.g. workshop, seminar, attending a professional conference)

 

AND

 

Provides evidence of an increased understanding of the teaching profession as a result of the PD

 

Participates in at least one

 

professional development opportunity (e.g. workshop, seminar, attending a professional conference)

 

Does not participate in any

 

professional development opportunity (e.g. workshop, seminar, attending a professional conference)

 

 

Question Comments : *Comment Required

Worked well with members of the school and mentor teacher.

Exceeds (3.000 pts)

             

Exceeds Expectations (3.000 pts)

 

Meets Expectations (2.000 pts)

 

Emerging (1.000 pt)

 

Does Not Meet Expectations (0.000 pt)

 

  1. O. Demonstrates Effective Communication with Parents or Legal Guardians

 

(1.000, 4.8%)

 

INTASC-2013.10.d

 

Provides evidence of communication with parents or legal guardians in accordance with district policies (e.g., letter of introduction, attends parent teacher conferences, communication via email or online)

 

AND

 

Provides information about P-12 learning to parents or legal guardians to promote understanding and academic progress

 

AND

 

Interacts with parents or legal

 

guardians in ways that improve understanding and encourage progress (e.g. exchange of email, face-to-face discussion, etc.)

 

Provides evidence of communication with parents or legal guardians in accordance with district policies (e.g., letter of introduction, attends parent teacher conferences, communication via email or online)

 

AND

 

Provides information about P-12 learning to parents or legal guardians to promote understanding and academic progress

 

Provides evidence of communication with parents or legal guardians in accordance with district policies (e.g., letter of introduction, attends parent teacher conferences, communication via email or online)

 

Does not provide evidence of

 

communication with parents or legal guardians

 

 

Question Comments : *Comment Required

Assisted in updating grades as needed.

Exceeds (3.000 pts)

             

Exceeds Expectations (3.000 pts)

 

Meets Expectations (2.000 pts)

 

Emerging (1.000 pt)

 

Does Not Meet Expectations (0.000 pt)

 

  1. P. Demonstrates Punctuality

 

(1.000, 4.8%)

INTASC-2013.9.o

 

Reports on time or early for daily

student teaching AND Additional teacher engagements (e.g.,

IEPs, teacher committees)

 

Reports on time for daily student

teaching

AND Additional teacher engagements (e.g.,

IEPs, teacher committees)

 

Inconsistently reports on time for daily

student teaching

AND/OR Additional teacher engagements (e.g.,

IEPs, teacher committees)

 

Does not report on time for student

teaching

AND/OR Additional teacher engagements (e.g.,

IEPs, teacher committees)

 

 

Question Comments : *Comment Required

Student teacher was always on time and present. Completed duties as assigned with mentor teacher.

Exceeds (3.000 pts)

             

Exceeds Expectations (3.000 pts)

 

Meets Expectations (2.000 pts)

 

Emerging (1.000 pt)

 

Does Not Meet Expectations (0.000 pt)

 

  1. Q. Meets Deadlines and Obligations

 

(1.000, 4.8%)

 

INTASC-2013.9.o

 

Meets deadlines and obligations established by the cooperating teacher and/or supervisor

 

AND

 

Informs all stakeholders (cooperating teacher, supervisor, and/or faculty members) of absences prior to the absence

 

AND

 

Provides clear and complete

 

directions and lessons for substitutes without reminders

 

Meets deadlines and obligations established by the cooperating teacher and/or supervisor

 

AND

 

Informs all stakeholders (cooperating teacher, supervisor, and/or faculty members) of absences prior to the absence

 

AND

 

Provides clear and complete

 

directions and lessons for substitutes

 

Most of the time meets deadlines and obligations established by the cooperating teacher and/or supervisor

 

AND

 

Informs some stakeholders

 

(cooperating teacher, supervisor, and/or faculty members) of absences prior to the absence

 

AND

 

Provides incomplete directions and lessons for substitutes

 

Frequently misses deadlines or obligations established by the cooperating teacher and/or supervisor

 

AND/OR

 

Does not inform stakeholders (cooperating teacher, supervisor, and/or faculty members) of absences prior to the absence

 

AND/OR

 

Does not provide directions and lessons for substitutes

 

 

Question Comments : *Comment Required

Completed duties as assigned with the mentor teacher.

Exceeds (3.000 pts)

             

Exceeds Expectations (3.000 pts)

 

Meets Expectations (2.000 pts)

 

Emerging (1.000 pt)

 

Does Not Meet Expectations (0.000 pt)

 

  1. R. Preparation

 

(1.000, 4.8%)

 

INTASC-2013.3.d

 

Prepared to teach on a daily basis with all materials (lesson plans, manipulatives, handouts, resources, etc.)

 

AND

 

Materials are easily accessible AND organized

 

AND

 

Prepared for the unexpected and flexible

 

Prepared to teach on a daily basis with all materials (lesson plans, manipulatives, handouts, resources, etc.)

 

AND

 

Materials are easily accessible AND organized

 

Not consistently prepared to teach on a daily basis with all materials (lesson plans, manipulatives, handouts, resources, etc.)

 

AND/OR

 

Materials are easily accessible OR organized

 

Not prepared to teach on a daily basis with all materials (lesson plans, manipulatives, handouts, resources, etc.)

 

AND/OR

 

Materials are not organized NOR easily accessible

 

 

Question Comments : *Comment Required

No issues.

Exceeds (3.000 pts)

             

Exceeds Expectations (3.000 pts)

 

Meets Expectations (2.000 pts)

 

Emerging (1.000 pt)

 

Does Not Meet Expectations (0.000 pt)

 

  1. S. Collaboration

 

(1.000, 4.8%)

 

INTASC-2013.10.b

 

Demonstrates collaborative

 

relationships with cooperating teacher AND/OR members of the school community (other teachers, school personnel, administrators, etc.)

 

AND

 

Works with and learns from

 

colleagues in planning and

 

implementing instruction to meet diverse needs of learners

 

Demonstrates collaborative

 

relationships with cooperating teacher AND/OR members of the school community (other teachers, school personnel, administrators, etc.)

 

AND

 

Attempts to work with and learn from colleagues in planning and

 

implementing instruction

 

Demonstrates collaborative

 

relationships with cooperating teacher AND/OR members of the school community (other teachers, school personnel, administrators, etc.)

 

Does not demonstrate collaborative relationships with cooperating teacher AND/OR members of the school community (other teachers, school personnel, administrators, etc.)

 

 

Question Comments : *Comment Required

Worked well with mentor teacher.

Exceeds (3.000 pts)

             

Exceeds Expectations (3.000 pts)

 

Meets Expectations (2.000 pts)

 

Emerging (1.000 pt)

 

Does Not Meet Expectations (0.000 pt)

 

  1. T. Advocacy to Meet the Needs of Learners or for the Teaching Profession

 

(1.000, 4.8%)

 

INTASC-2013.10.j

 

Recognizes and articulates specific areas in need of advocacy, including the

 

  1. 1. Needs of learners (e.g. academic, physical, social, emotional, and cultural needs; OR adequate resources, equitable opportunities) OR

 

  1. 2. Needs of the teaching profession (e.g. technology integration, research based practices)

 

AND

 

Takes action(s) based upon identified needs, while following district

 

protocols

 

Recognizes and articulates specific areas in need of advocacy, including the

 

  1. 1. Needs of learners (e.g. academic, physical, social, emotional, and cultural needs; OR adequate

 

resources, equitable opportunities) OR

 

  1. 2. Needs of the teaching profession (e.g. technology integration, research based practices)

 

Recognizes areas in need of

 

advocacy, but cannot articulate the 1. Needs of learners (e.g. academic, physical, social, emotional, and cultural needs; OR adequate resources, equitable opportunities) OR

 

  1. 2. Needs of the teaching profession (e.g. technology integration, research based practices)

 

Does not recognize areas in need of advocacy, including the

 

  1. 1. Needs of learners (e.g. academic, physical, social, emotional, and cultural needs; OR adequate

 

resources, equitable opportunities) OR

 

  1. 2. Needs of the teaching profession (e.g. technology integration, research based practices)

 

 

Question Comments : *Comment Required

Followed all school rules and guidelines.

Exceeds (3.000 pts)

             

Exceeds Expectations (3.000 pts)

 

Meets Expectations (2.000 pts)

 

Emerging (1.000 pt)

 

Does Not Meet Expectations (0.000 pt)

 

  1. U. Responds Positively to Feedback and Constructive Criticism

 

(1.000, 4.8%)

 

INTASC-2013.9.n

 

Is receptive to feedback, constructive criticism, supervision, and responds professionally

 

AND

 

Incorporates feedback (e.g., from co

Assignments: Arlene Nicole Lemley
Assignments
Nine-week unit plan for a high school choir. A curriculum plan for a third-grade general music class. A lesson plan for teaching high school choir students to sing in four-part harmonies.  Unit Plan Lesson Plan (.docx) 0.08mb
Association & Society Membership: Arlene Nicole Lemley
Professional Associations

NAFME Membership

Please review your home and work address information, and update if needed, so that we can

 better serve you.

 To renew, click “Memberships/Print Membership Confirmation” in the left sidebar.

 Memberships/Print Membership

 Confirmation 0

 Arlene Lemley

 anlemley@liberty.edu

 Active

 Collegiate National Membership

 Membership Number: 003075575

 Term Start Date: 9/4/2022

 Term End Date: 6/30/2023

 Paid Through Date: 6/30/2023

 Virginia (VMEA) (Collegiate)

 Same information as Collegiate National Membership

 Manage Renew

 Let's Chat

 Let's Chat

 

 

Christian Educators Membership

Your membership is currently active. Details Membership History Current Membership Your Membership is currently active. Membership College Student Start Date 02/10/2022 Membership History Membership Start Date End Date 02/09/2023 End Date College 


NAFME Membership and Christian Educators membership.
Internships: Arlene Nicole Lemley
Cumulative Log

Cumulative log of some of the practicum experiences and student teaching experiences.

The fifth-grade students played Orff instruments and Recorders. The 2nd graders were taught how to play the hand drums. She had the 2nd graders to sit in a circle and she told them to leave the drums on the floor like the drums were a soup bowl and most of the kids followed the rule however there was a couple who did not follow the rule and she had to tell them what to do again. They enjoyed playing the drums.

I taught first-grade students how to count quarter notes and the kids danced to a song about Thanksgiving. Later students in fifth grade practiced for their Christmas concert.

 

Students in the high school choir practiced sight reading and then they watched a video of their concert that they performed the previous week. The students seemed to enjoy watching their performance and they critiqued themselves on how good they did and discussed what they needed to work on. Middle school students were learning to read notes on the staff. The students did an activity on their laptops where they had to label the notes on the staff.  

 

Students in fifth grade were learning how to play Orff instruments. Fourth and fifth-grade students on Fridays would get to sing in the choir and they practiced their music for their concert. The class is very large. The students seem to really enjoy singing in the choir.

 

High school choir students started learning music for their Christmas concert. Students started learning how to sing Carol of the Bells. The choir is starting to learn to sing in four-part harmonies they have sung in three parts but they have not tried four-part harmonies, so Carol of the Bells is a little difficult for them. Students in the choir are getting better at singing Carol of the Bells. Students are learning to sing Winter Wonderland.

Middle School students are learning about the music of the 50s. They are familiar with a few of the songs. Middle School students are starting to learn about the music of the 60s. They like it when they get to learn about music that they already know, and some students like to dance to the music that they know.