Introduction:
The worldview a person holds has an effect on the way they view and interact with the world around them. A biblical worldview not only has an effect on every aspect of a Christian's life, but it also effects the people the Christian comes in contact with on a daily basis. This is especially true for Christians in the field of education. This paper will look at the meaning and origin of a Biblical worldview, the educational philosophy of the Christian, and the effects a biblical worldview has on the practice of education.
Biblical Worldview:
What is a worldview? Merriam-Webster.com gives the definition of worldview as “a comprehensive conception or apprehension of the world especially from a specific standpoint.” Worldview could be described as viewing the world through a pair of sunglasses. The color of the lenses affects the way a person sees everything in the world. For the Christian, the worldview lenses would be the Bible. As a person spends time in the Word of God, they begin to have clearer vision of their view of man, their view of God, the history of the past, the present day, and the future to come.
There are several types of worldviews, but there are three aspects found in each view: basic beliefs, a master story, and action. (Arianna, 2021)
The Basic Beliefs
There are several basic beliefs a Christian worldview is built upon. The first belief is God exists. Hebrews 11:6 says: “And without faith it is impossible to please him, for whoever would draw near to God must believe that he exists and that he rewards those who seek him.” (ESV, 2016)
The second belief is that God created everything. Genesis 1:1 says “In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth.” (ESV, 2016)
The third belief is that not only did God create everything, but He also keeps everything running. Colossians 1:17 says “And he is before all things, and in him all things hold together.” (ESV, 2016)
The fourth basic belief is that the Bible is God’s inspired Word for the world. John 1:1 says In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. (ESV, 2016)
The Big Story
This “Big Story” in the Biblical worldview contains the origin of man. Genesis 1:27 “So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them.” (ESV, 2016) The fall of man into sin. Genesis chapter 3 talks of how Adam and Eve fell to sin, and through them all generations would be born sinners. Their sin created the need for a Redeemer. The New Testament speaks of the virgin birth of Jesus. How He lived a sinless life on earth. Was killed on a cross. Was buried, and three days later would rise from the dead—having conquered death and paid the sin debt for man. Allowing those who trust in Him to have eternal life together with Him in heaven.
The Belief in Action
If a person has the basic beliefs and a knowledge of the Big Story, what are they to do with this information? They are supposed to let the “sunglasses” of their Biblical worldview change the way that they see the world around them! What actions would a biblical worldview cause a person to take? Loving others, showing compassion, being honest, patient, and kind, these are just a few of the ways a biblical worldview could be shown in action.
Christian Philosophy of Education
The metaphysics of a Christian philosophy of education are the basis of this truth is God and His Word. Knowing what the Bible tells us about the origins of man and all that God did in planning and implementing the plan to redeem His creation, should give the Christian educator a good base to start from when deciding what philosophies of education they should follow.
Educators should see the care God has for people (as seen in the sacrifice of Jesus) means that all people are important to Him. This knowledge should move educators to respond with care and love to all students and families of students—even if they are difficult to love. Romans 5:8 says: “but God shows his love for us in that while we were still sinners, Christ died for us.” (ESV, 2016) God loves us and gave His son for us even when we are completely against Him.
Implications for Educational Practice
“The purpose of Christian education is the directing of the process of human development toward God’s objective for man: godliness of character and action.” (Horton, 2017)
Christian education, unlike secular education, is free to teach students to live godly lives. This should (we all have free will) allow for students to become productive citizens in our world. Students are taught:
- To care for others
- To show respect to authority
- To love God and His Word
- To do one’s best in all subjects.
The area of special education can especially benefit from a Christian perspective. The students in these classes will need a patient teacher. One who is loving and kind, and cares for them no matter where they are or how they are acting that day.
Conclusion
The Biblical worldview changes how we view people and the world around us much like a pair of sunglasses change the way things look when we put them on. It is important for the Christian educator to have on the “sunglasses” of God’s word at all times. This will allow us to have the strength we will need to keep going, keep loving, keep teaching, and keep advocating for our students and their families.
References
Arianna. (2021, July 27). What is a biblical worldview and why is it important in education? https://blog.bjupress.com/blog/2021/07/27/biblical-worldview-in-education /#:~:text=This%20definition%20of%20worldview%20can,evaluate%20will%20contain%20these%20elements.
The Holy Bible, English Standard Version. ESV® Text Edition: 2016. Crossway Bibles. https://www.biblegateway.com
Gutek, G.L. (2014). Philosophical, ideological, and theoretical perspectives on education. (2nd ed.). Pearson.
Horton, R. Dr. (Ed.). (2017). Handbook of christian education. Journey Forth.
Merriam-Webster. (n.d.). Merriam-Webster.com dictionary. Retrieved September 24, 2022, from https://www.merriam-webster.com/
|
Field Experience Summary: SPECIAL EDUCATION |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
▪ List all field experiences on this Field Experience Summary (FES) that you completed in your endorsement area through practicums and student teaching. Refer to the Field Experience Rubric below to review target goals for placement expectations. ▪ Although not required, you may also list experiences related to service in actual elementary schools (i.e., after-school tutoring programs, substitute teaching, etc.) on this FES under the section labeled “Previous Experiences”. ▪ You may use your resume and portfolio to highlight all of your other experience with children (i.e., teaching Sunday school, summer camps, etc.), but those experiences should not be included on this FES. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Teacher Candidate: Jennifer Helfenbein |
LU ID: L33209035
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
LU Email: jhelfenbein@liberty.edu |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Hours Indirect vs. Direct
|
Placement Description
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Course Indicate N/A if not course-based experience |
Date(s) |
Indirect Observe
|
Direct Teach/ Assist |
School Name/Location |
Age/Grade/ Subject Area |
Christian, Private, or Public School |
Cultural Diversity |
Exceptionalities |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Ethnicity |
SES |
Gender |
Language |
Urban |
Rural |
Other |
Learning Disability |
Autism |
Emotional Disturbance |
Intellectual Disability |
Other Health Impairment |
Developmental Delay |
|
Multiple Disabilities |
Traumatic Brain Injury |
Other |
|||||||||||
|
EXAMPLE |
EDUC 588 |
01/27/2021-05/14/2021 |
44 |
1 |
Linkhorne Elementary School (Lynchburg, VA) |
1st Grade All Subjects |
Public |
X |
X |
X |
|
X |
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
EDSP 688 |
8/2023- |
44 |
1 |
Concord Junior High School |
7th and 8th grade all subjects |
Public |
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
|
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
X |
X |
|
X |
|
|
||||
|
EDLC 588 |
1/2024- |
45 |
0 |
Virtual: The Teaching Channel |
All subjects All grades |
Public /Private |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
X |
X |
|
X |
|
X |
|
|
|
|
||||
|
N/A |
12/08/2025 |
3 |
1 |
Elkhart Christian Academy |
5th grade |
Christian School
|
X |
|
X |
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Student Teaching Semester (Example: EDST 460) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
EDST 562 |
Fall 2025 |
108 |
171.5 |
Concord Junior High School |
7th and 8th grade LA/Math/Resource class |
Public |
x |
x |
x |
x |
|
|
X |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
EDST 562 |
|
53.2 |
95.45 |
Concord South Side Elementary |
k-4 reading interventions, math support |
|
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
|
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
X |
|
|
||||
|
TOTAL HOURS |
253.2 |
266.95 |
Minimum of 150 direct teaching hours must be included. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Previous Experiences |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Date(s) |
Position/Role Held during Previous Experience (Substitute, IA/TA, paraprofessional, etc.) |
School Name/Location |
Age/Grade/ Subject Area |
Christian, Private, or Public School |
Cultural Diversity |
Exceptionalities |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Ethnicity |
SES |
Gender |
Language |
Urban |
Rural |
Other |
Learning Disability |
Autism |
Emotional Disturbance |
Intellectual Disability |
Other Health Impairment |
Developmental Delay |
|
Multiple Disabilities |
Traumatic Brain Injury |
Other |
|||||||||||
|
11/2019-05/2025 |
Paraprofessional, Substitute teacher, In School Suspension Supervisor, Summer School Paraprofessional |
Concord Junior High School |
7th and 8th grade, All subjects, plus Spanish, Music, and Art |
Public |
x |
x |
x |
x |
|
x |
|
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
|
x |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Professional Organization Memberships |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Name of Organization |
Initial Membership |
Renewal Date |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Month |
Year |
Month |
Year |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
02 |
2025 |
02 |
2025 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Field Experience Rubric: SPECIAL EDUCATION
Review the Field Experience Rubric specific to your program:
Early Childhood (Birth – Age 5)
Field Experience Rubric: SPECIAL EDUCATION – Adapted Curriculum (K-12)
Use this Field Experience Rubric as a guide in seeking diverse field experiences throughout your program. Your University Supervisor will use this rubric to evaluate your FES during your student teaching semester. Membership and participation in professional organization(s) is also expected. Current membership (valid through the end of the student teaching semester) is required in an organization for your endorsement area (e.g., PDK, KDP, ILA, NAEYC, NMSA, CEC, ASU, CEAI, other state and local organizations, etc.)
|
Teacher Candidate: |
LU ID: |
|||
|
CAEP |
InTASC |
Setting |
Recommended |
Required |
|
R1.1, R1.3, R2.3 |
1, 3, 7 |
Christian School |
One or more field experiences in a Christian school setting (must be an in-person visit). |
One field experience in a Christian school setting (may be virtual if an in-person visit is not available.) |
|
R1.1, R1.3, R2.3 |
3, 7, 8 |
Public School |
Two or more field experiences in public school setting. |
One field experience in public school setting. |
|
R1.1, R2.3 |
1, 2, 3 |
Cultural diversity (ethnicity, SES, gender, language, urban, rural, etc.) |
Combined field experiences include placements with students who represent three or more types of cultural diversity. |
Combined field experiences include placements with students who represent two types of cultural diversity. |
|
R1.1, R1.3, R2.3 |
1, 2, 8 |
Exceptionalities: (learning disability, autism, emotional disturbance, intellectual disability, other health impairment, developmental delay, multiple disabilities, traumatic brain injury, etc.) |
Combined field experiences include placements with students who represent four or more types of exceptionalities. |
Combined field experiences include placements with students who represent three types of exceptionalities. |
|
R1.1, R1.3, R2.3 |
1, 2, 3 |
Grades K-6
|
Two or more field experiences in grades K-6. |
One field experience in grades K-6. |
|
R1.1, R1.3, R2.3 |
1, 2, 3 |
Grades 6-12
|
Two or more field experiences in grades 6-12. (experiences in both 6-8 and 9-12 strongly recommended) |
One field experience in grades 6-12. (experiences in both 6-8 and 9-12 strongly recommended) |
|
R1.4, R3.2 |
9, 10 |
Professional Organizations |
Two or more current memberships (valid through the end of the student teaching semester) in an educational professional organization. |
One current membership (valid through the end of the student teaching semester) in an educational professional organization. |
|
R1.3, R2.3 |
7, 8 |
Student Teaching |
Successfully completed all required weeks of student teaching with more than 150 direct teaching hours. |
Successfully completed all required weeks of student teaching with 150 direct teaching hours. |
Field Experience Rubric: SPECIAL EDUCATION – Early Childhood Special Education (Birth – Age 5)
Use this Field Experience Rubric as a guide in seeking diverse field experiences throughout your program. Your University Supervisor will use this rubric to evaluate your FES during your student teaching semester. Membership and participation in professional organization(s) is also expected. Current membership (valid through the end of the student teaching semester) is required in an organization for your endorsement area (e.g., PDK, KDP, ILA, NAEYC, NMSA, CEC, ASU, CEAI, other state and local organizations, etc.)
|
Teacher Candidate: |
LU ID: |
|||
|
CAEP |
InTASC |
Setting |
Recommended |
Required |
|
R1.1, R1.3, R2.3 |
1, 3, 7 |
Christian Program or Service Provider |
One or more field experiences in a Christian setting (must be an in-person visit). |
One field experience in a Christian setting (may be virtual if an in-person visit is not available.) |
|
R1.1, R1.3, R2.3 |
3, 7, 8 |
Public Program or Service Provider |
Two or more field experiences in public setting. |
One field experience in public setting. |
|
R1.1, R2.3 |
1, 2, 3 |
Cultural diversity (ethnicity, SES, gender, language, urban, rural, etc.) |
Combined field experiences include placements with students who represent three or more types of cultural diversity. |
Combined field experiences include placements with students who represent two types of cultural diversity. |
|
R1.1, R1.3, R2.3 |
1, 2, 8 |
Exceptionalities: (autism, emotional disturbance, intellectual disability, other health impairment, developmental delay, multiple disabilities, traumatic brain injury, etc.) |
Combined field experiences include placements with students who represent four or more types of exceptionalities. |
Combined field experiences include placements with students who represent three types of exceptionalities. |
|
R1.1, R1.3, R2.3 |
1, 2, 8 |
Birth – Age 5
|
Three or more field experiences in the areas of Birth – Age 5. |
Two field experience in the areas of Birth – Age 5. |
|
R1.4, R3.2 |
9, 10 |
Professional Organizations |
Two or more current memberships (valid through the end of the student teaching semester) in an educational professional organization. |
One current membership (valid through the end of the student teaching semester) in an educational professional organization. (eg. CEAI membership) |
|
R1.3, R2.3 |
7, 8 |
Student Teaching |
Successfully completed all required weeks of student teaching with more than 150 direct teaching hours. |
Successfully completed all required weeks of student teaching with 150 direct teaching hours. |
Field Experience Rubric: SPECIAL EDUCATION – General Curriculum (K-12)
Use this Field Experience Rubric as a guide in seeking diverse field experiences throughout your program. Your University Supervisor will use this rubric to evaluate your FES during your student teaching semester. Membership and participation in professional organization(s) is also expected. Current membership (valid through the end of the student teaching semester) is required in an organization for your endorsement area (e.g., PDK, KDP, ILA, NAEYC, NMSA, CEC, ASU, CEAI, other state and local organizations, etc.)
|
Teacher Candidate: |
LU ID: |
|||
|
CAEP |
InTASC |
Setting |
Recommended |
Required |
|
R1.1, R1.3, R2.3 |
1, 3, 7 |
Christian School |
One or more field experiences in a Christian school setting (must be an in-person visit). |
One field experience in a Christian school setting (may be virtual if an in-person visit is not available.) |
|
R1.1, R1.3, R2.3 |
3, 7, 8 |
Public School |
Two or more field experiences in public school setting. |
One field experience in public school setting. |
|
R1.1, R2.3 |
1, 2, 3 |
Cultural diversity (ethnicity, SES, gender, language, urban, rural, etc.) |
Combined field experiences include placements with students who represent three or more types of cultural diversity. |
Combined field experiences include placements with students who represent two types of cultural diversity. |
|
R1.1, R1.3, R2.3 |
1, 2, 8 |
Exceptionalities: (learning disability, autism, emotional disturbance, intellectual disability, other health impairment, developmental delay, multiple disabilities, traumatic brain injury, etc.) |
Combined field experiences include placements with students who represent four or more types of exceptionalities. |
Combined field experiences include placements with students who represent three types of exceptionalities. |
|
R1.1, R1.3, R2.3 |
1, 2, 3 |
Grades K-6
|
Two or more field experiences in grades K-6. |
One field experience in grades K-6. |
|
R1.1, R1.3, R2.3 |
1, 2, 3 |
Grades 6-12
|
Two or more field experiences in grades 6-12. (experiences in both 6-8 and 9-12 strongly recommended) |
One field experience in grades 6-12. (experiences in both 6-8 and 9-12 strongly recommended) |
|
R1.4, R3.2 |
9, 10 |
Professional Organizations |
Two or more current memberships (valid through the end of the student teaching semester) in an educational professional organization. |
One current membership (valid through the end of the student teaching semester) in an educational professional organization. (eg. CEAI membership) |
|
R1.3, R2.3 |
7, 8 |
Student Teaching |
Successfully completed all required weeks of student teaching with more than 150 direct teaching hours. |
Successfully completed all required weeks of student teaching with 150 direct teaching hours. |
Included in this document are my PreCPAST evaluation from my practicum, my Mid-term CPAST evaluation, and my Final CPAST evaluation.
15 Dec 2023 Page 1 of 7Intern Name: Jennifer Helfenbein
Internship: EDSP 688-A01
Submitted: Dec 14, 2023 Supervisor(s): Charlotte Walker
Course/Term: EDSP 688 - Section A01 : Initial Lic Prac Special Ed II ( Fall 2023 ) Mentor(s): Tim Krecsmar
Assessor: Tim Krecsmar (Mentor) Site: Concord Junior High School
(Elkhart, IN),
59397 CR 11 S,
Elkhart IN 46517
Comments: Jennifer is very conscientious in planning and implementation of her lessons. Additionally, she uses a variety of assessments throughout the lesson to make sure all students are engaged and understanding the material and the expectations of completing the assignment. The students Jennifer is working with have had difficulty in the school settings and often have skill deficits as well as problems with interpersonal interactions. Jennifer does a wonderful job assessing what each student needs and provides that support while maintaining an entire group lesson.
Suggested Letter Grade Rubric
Subject(s): Special Education -
General Curriculum Grade(s): 7th, 8th
|
A (4.000 pts) |
B (3.000 pts) |
C (2.000 pts) |
D (1.000 pts) |
F |
N/A |
|
|
Please provide a suggested letter grade to signify the candidate's overall performance and effort during the practicum. 1/1 (100%) |
||||||
|
Comments: |
||||||
|
4.000 pts | 100 % |
||||||
Pre-CPAST Directions
|
Directions – The form will be used once during the course of the term and will be provided by the Program Coordinator to the University Supervisor, Host Teacher, and Candidate. Additional information about and support for using the form can be found in the “Glossary” and “Look Fors” for select rows (indicated by an *) at the end of this document |
Glossary of Terms
15 Dec 2023 Page 2 of 7
|
Glossary of Terms Analysis: Careful and critical examination of data and/or processes to identify key components and potential outcomes. Assessment: “Process of monitoring, measuring, evaluating, documenting, reflecting on, and adjusting teaching and relearning to ensure that learners reach high levels of Achievement Candidate: (Also known as "intern") An individual participating in a full-time field experience in a P12 classroom in order to obtain professional education licensure/certification. Cooperating Teachers: (Also known as “mentor teachers”) Teachers in schools who mentor and supervise student teachers in their classrooms for the duration of a student teaching and/or field experience. Data-informed decisions: “Focuses on using student assessment data and relevant background information to inform decisions related to planning and implementing instructional strategies at the district, school, classroom, and individual student levels.” Developmental Theory (General): Theories that describe the stages of development of children/adolescents (e.g., Erikson’s Theory of Psychosocial Development, Kohlberg’s Theory of Moral Development, Piaget’s Cognitive Development Theory, Behavioral Theories, and Sociocultural Theories). Developmental Theory (Content-Specific): Content-specific teaching that organizes activities and learning tasks to help learners move from one level to the next. Evidence: Artifacts that document and demonstrate how [the student teacher] planned and implemented instruction Feedback: “Information communicated to the learner that is intended to modify the learner’s thinking or behavior for the purpose of improving learning.” Formative Assessment: “Assessment used continuously throughout learning and teaching, allowing teachers to adjust instruction to improve learner achievement.”1 Goals: See definition for “Measurable Goals.” Learner: Any P12 student in the student teacher’s classroom. Learning Environment: Any setting where learning occurs. The term may refer to the physical environment (e.g., the classroom), as well as the classroom management procedures and activities that enable teaching and learning to take place. Measurable Goals: “Provides information for describing, assessing, and evaluating student achievement.” Mentor Teachers: See definition for “Cooperating Teachers.” Objectives/Targets: P12 student (learner) learning outcomes to be achieved by the end of the lesson or learning segment. Problem Solving: A mental process that involves discovering, analyzing, and solving problems. The ultimate goal of problem-solving is to overcome obstacles and find a solution that best resolves the issue. Program Coordinator: Faculty or staff member from a college or university who coordinates/manages the administrative components of a teacher educator licensure program. Research: "The use of rigorous, systematic, and objective methodologies to obtain reliable and valid knowledge." Targets: See definition for 'Objectives/Targets.' University Supervisor (US): The university instructor assigned to the student teacher who regularly observes his/her performance to provide feedback on strengths and weaknesses. The US coordinates the student teacher’s evaluation, and is responsible for recording the consensus scores using this form. |
Pre-CPAST Evaluation Rubric
|
Meets Expectations (2.000 pts) |
Emerging (1.000 pts) |
Does Not Meet Expectations |
N/A |
|
|
A. Focus for Learning: Standards and Objectives/Targets 1/14 (7%) INTASC-2013.7.a, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.3 |
Plans align to appropriate P-12 state Learning Standards AND Goals are measurable AND Standards, objectives/ targets, and learning tasks are consistently aligned with each other AND Articulates objectives/targets that are appropriate for learners |
Plans align to appropriate P-12 state Learning Standards AND/OR Some goals are measurable AND/OR Standards, objectives/targets, and learning tasks, are loosely or are not consistently aligned with each other AND/OR Articulates some objectives/targets that are appropriate for learners |
Plans do not align to the appropriate P-12 state Learning Standards AND/OR Goals are absent or not measurable AND/OR Standards, objectives/targets, and learning tasks are not aligned with each other AND/OR Does not articulate objectives/targets that are appropriate for learners |
|
|
Comments: |
||||
|
B. Assessment of P-12 Learning 1/14 (7%) INTASC-2013.6.b, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.3 |
Planned assessments 1. Provide opportunities for learners to illustrate competence 2. Align with the P-12 state Learning Standards |
Planned assessments 1. Provide opportunities for some learners to illustrate competence OR 2. Align with the P-12 state Learning Standards |
Planned assessments 1. Are not included OR 2. Do not align with the P-12 state Learning Standards |
|
|
Comments: |
||||
15 Dec 2023 Page 3 of 7
|
C. Learning Target and Directions 1/14 (7%) INTASC-2013.7.c, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.3 |
Articulates an accurate and clear learning target AND Articulates accurate directions/explanations AND Sequences learning experiences appropriately |
Articulates an inaccurate or unclear learning target AND/OR Articulates inaccurate directions/explanations |
Does not articulate the learning target OR Does not articulate directions/explanations |
|
|
Comments: |
||||
|
D. Checking for Understanding and Adjusting Instruction through Formative Assessment 1/14 (7%) INTASC-2013.8.b, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.3 |
Checks for understanding (whole class/group) during lessons using formative assessment AND Differentiates through adjustments to instruction (whole class/group) |
Inconsistently checks for understanding during lessons using formative assessment AND Adjusts instruction accordingly, but adjustments may cause additional confusion |
Does not check for understanding during lessons using formative assessment OR Does not make any adjustments based on learners’ responses |
|
|
Comments: |
||||
|
E. Digital Tools and Resources 1/14 (7%) INTASC.6.I, INTASC.5.L, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.2 |
Discusses AND uses developmentally appropriate technologies (digital tools and resources) that 1. Are relevant to learning objectives/ targets of the lesson 2. Engage learners in the demonstration of knowledge or skills |
Discusses developmentally appropriate technologies (digital tools and resources) relevant to learning objectives/ targets of the lesson AND Technology is not available |
One of the following: A. Does not use technologies (digital tools and resources) to engage learners AND Technology is available in the setting OR B. Use of technologies is not relevant to the learning objectives/ targets of the lesson OR C. Does not discuss technologies AND Technology is not available in the setting |
|
|
Comments: |
||||
|
F. Safe and Respectful Learning Environment 1/14 (7%) INTASC-2013.3.d, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.1 |
Manages a safe and respectful learning environment through the use of routines and transitions (i.e., classroom management) AND Establishes and promotes constructive relationships to equitably engage learners |
Attempts to manage a safe learning environment through the use of routines and transitions (i.e., classroom management) AND/OR Attempts to establish constructive relationships to engage learners |
Does not manage a safe learning environment (i.e., insufficient classroom management) OR Does not establish constructive relationships to engage learners |
|
|
Comments: |
||||
|
G. Data-Guided Instruction 1/14 (7%) INTASC.6.I, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.3 |
Uses data-informed decisions to design instruction and assessment |
Uses minimal data to design instruction and assessment |
Does not use data to design instruction and assessment |
|
|
Comments: |
||||
|
H. Feedback to Learners 1/14 (7%) INTASC-2013.6.d, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.3 |
Provides feedback that 1. Enables learners to recognize strengths OR areas for improvement AND Provides timely feedback |
Provides minimal feedback that 1. Enables learners to recognize strengths OR areas for improvement OR Feedback is provided in a somewhat timely fashion |
Does not provide feedback OR Feedback does not enable learners to recognize strengths OR areas for improvement OR Feedback is not provided in a timely fashion |
|
|
Comments: |
||||
|
I. Assessment Techniques 1/14 (7%) INTASC-2013.7.d, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.3 |
Evaluates and supports learning through assessment techniques that are 1. Developmentally appropriate 2. Formative |
Assessment techniques are 1. Developmentally appropriate 2. Formative |
Assessment techniques are 1. Developmentally inappropriate OR Not used |
|
|
Comments: |
||||
|
J. Connections to Research and Theory 1/14 (7%) CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.1 |
Discusses and provides evidence of connections to educational research and/or theory |
Mentions connections to educational research and/or theory |
No connections OR inaccurate connections to educational research and/or theory |
|
|
Comments: |
||||
|
K. Demonstrates Punctuality 1/14 (7%) INTASC-2013.9.o, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.4 |
Reports on time for experience AND Additional teacher engagements (e.g., IEPs, teacher committees) |
Inconsistently reports on time for experience AND/OR Additional teacher engagements (e.g., IEPs, teacher committees) |
Does not report on time for experience AND/OR Additional teacher engagements (e.g., IEPs, teacher committees) |
|
|
Comments: |
||||
15 Dec 2023 Page 4 of 7
|
L. Meets Deadlines and Obligations 1/14 (7%) INTASC-2013.9.o, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.4 |
Meets deadlines and obligations established by the cooperating teacher, instructor, and/or supervisor AND Informs all stakeholders (cooperating teacher, supervisor, instructor, and/or faculty members) of absences prior to the absence |
Most of the time meets deadlines and obligations established by the cooperating teacher, instructor, and/or supervisor AND Informs some stakeholders (cooperating teacher, supervisor, instructor, and/or faculty members) of absences prior to the absence |
Frequently misses deadlines or obligations established by the cooperating teacher, instructor, and/or supervisor AND/OR Does not inform stakeholders (cooperating teacher, supervisor, instructor, and/or faculty members) of absences prior to the absence |
|
|
Comments: |
||||
|
M. Collaboration 1/14 (7%) INTASC-2013.10.b, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.4 |
Demonstrates collaborative relationships with cooperating teacher AND/OR members of the school community (other teachers, school personnel, administrators, etc.) AND Attempts to work with and learn from colleagues in planning and implementing instruction |
Demonstrates collaborative relationships with cooperating teacher AND/OR members of the school community (other teachers, school personnel, administrators, etc.) |
Does not demonstrate collaborative relationships with cooperating teacher AND/OR members of the school community (other teachers, school personnel, administrators, etc.) |
|
|
Comments: |
||||
|
N. Responds Positively to Feedback and Constructive Criticism 1/14 (7%) INTASC-2013.9.n, CAEP-Initial-2022.R1.4 |
Is receptive to feedback, constructive criticism, supervision, and responds professionally AND Incorporates feedback (e.g., from cooperating teacher, university supervisor) to improve practice |
Is receptive to feedback, constructive criticism, and supervision AND/OR Incorporates feedback inconsistently |
Is not receptive to feedback, constructive criticism, and supervision AND/OR Does not incorporate feedback |
|
|
Comments: |
||||
|
28.000 pts | 100 % |
||||
Setting
|
City (3.000 pts) |
Suburban (2.000 pts) |
Town (1.000 pts) |
Rural |
N/A |
|
|
School Setting (This section's scoring will not affect the student's overall score. The point values are for reporting purposes only.) 1/1 (100%) |
|||||
|
Comments: |
|||||
|
3.000 pts | 100 % |
|||||
Method of Instructional Delivery
|
Virtual Only (3.000 pts) |
Hybrid (2.000 pts) |
In Person Only (1.000 pts) |
N/A |
|
|
Method of Instructional Delivery (This section's scoring will not affect the student's overall score. The point values are for reporting purposes only.) 1/1 (100%) |
||||
|
Comments: |
||||
|
1.000 pts | 33.33 % |
||||
Directions for Pre-SCRIP Dispositions Assessment Rubric
15 Dec 2023 Page 5 of 7
|
Dear Host Teacher, Cooperating Teacher, or On-site Mentor, Before completing the SCRIP/Pre-SCRIP assessment, please review the SCRIP/Pre-SCRIP Scorer Training video. This video will explain the importance of this assessment and will provide direction on how to accurately score the candidate using the instrument. The video is less than 15 minutes in length. Here is the link: https://watch.liberty.edu/media/t/1_gvd5n0i1 Also attached is a copy of the PowerPoint used in the video in case you would like to refer back to the slides after watching the training. Thank you so much for investing in the training and preparation of future educators! |
Pre-SCRIP Dispositions Assessment Rubric
|
Level 2: Met- Proficient (2.000 pts) |
Level 1: Not Met- Developing (1.000 pts) |
Level 0: Not Met- No Evidence |
N/A |
|
|
Social Responsibility Cross-Cutting Theme: Diversity 1/5 (20%) INTASC-2013.10, INTASC-2013.6, INTASC-2013.7, INTASC-2013.2, INTASC-2013.3, NASDTEC-MCEE 2015.1, NASDTEC-MCEE 2015.3, NASDTEC-MCEE 2015.2, NASDTEC-MCEE 2015.5, NASDTEC-MCEE 2015.4, CAEP-2013 (rev).1.1, CAEP-2013 (rev).1.4, InTASC-2017.2.d, CAEP-2013 (rev).CCT-Diversity, CAEP-Initial 2022.R1.4 |
The candidate demonstrates the belief that all students can learn. AND The candidate demonstrates a sense of fairness, justice, and equity for all students. AND The candidate differentiates instruction to meet the needs of all diverse learners AND The candidate interacts effectively with students to provide a positive, structured, safe learning environment. |
The candidate states that all students can learn BUT the candidate’s actions do not confirm the belief. OR The candidate demonstrates a sense of fairness, justice, and equity for certain groups of students. OR The candidate differentiates instruction BUT the instruction does not address the needs of all learners. OR The classroom environment is lacking in positive affirmation, structure, OR safety. |
The candidate has not provided any evidence. |
|
|
Comments: |
||||
|
Commitment 1/5 (20%) INTASC-2013.10, INTASC-2013.6, INTASC-2013.7, INTASC-2013.9, INTASC-2013.2, INTASC-2013.1, INTASC-2013.9.o, NASDTEC-MCEE 2015.1, NASDTEC-MCEE 2015.2, CAEP-2013 (rev).1.1, CAEP-Initial 2022.R1.4 |
The candidate follows through on commitments and takes responsibilities seriously. AND The candidate completes assigned tasks on time. AND The candidate attends class, field experiences, and meetings consistently and promptly. AND The candidate shows the self- discipline and work ethic essential to be planned, prepared and organized for successful instruction and learning to occur. |
The candidate makes commitments that he/she is unable to keep. OR The candidate completes assigned tasks after the deadline. OR The candidate is late to class, field experiences, OR meetings. OR The candidate’s lack of planning, preparation, or organization hinders successful instruction. |
The candidate has not provided any evidence. |
|
|
Comments: |
||||
15 Dec 2023 Page 6 of 7
|
Reflective Practice 1/5 (20%) INTASC-2013.10, INTASC-2013.6, INTASC-2013.8, INTASC-2013.2, INTASC-2013.3, INTASC-2013.1, INTASC-2013.9.g, NASDTEC-MCEE 2015.3, NASDTEC-MCEE 2015.2, NASDTEC-MCEE 2015.5, NASDTEC-MCEE 2015.4, CAEP-2013 (rev).1.1, CAEP-2013 (rev).1.2, ISTE-2017.7, CAEP-2013 (rev).1.3, CAEP-Initial 2022.R1.4 |
The candidate thoughtfully considers educational matters and the practice of teaching. AND The candidate makes choices after pondering ideas and experiences. AND The candidate learns from journaling and discussions with colleagues. |
The candidate spends little time reflecting on the practice of teaching. OR The candidate acts quickly before thinking about the results. OR The candidate does not use feedback to change. |
The candidate has not provided any evidence. |
|
|
Comments: |
||||
|
Integrity 1/5 (20%) INTASC-2013.10, INTASC-2013.7, INTASC-2013.9, INTASC-2013.5, INTASC-2013.1, NASDTEC-MCEE 2015.1, NASDTEC-MCEE 2015.3, NASDTEC-MCEE 2015.2, NASDTEC-MCEE 2015.4, CAEP-2013 (rev).1.1, ISTE-2017.3, InTASC-2017.9.m, CAEP-Initial 2022.R1.4 |
The candidate models exemplary citizenship. AND The candidate acts in an ethical and moral manner AND The candidate values honesty inside and outside of the classroom AND The candidate demonstrates trustworthiness. AND The candidate maintains confidentiality and discretion. |
The candidate does not follow the rules or the law. OR The candidate acts in a way which causes others to question his/her ethics or morals. OR The candidate does not protect confidential information. OR The candidate lacks discretion. |
The candidate has not provided any evidence. |
|
|
Comments: |
||||
|
Professionalism1/5 (20%) INTASC-2013.10, INTASC-2013.6, INTASC-2013.7, INTASC-2013.9, INTASC-2013.2, INTASC-2013.1, NASDTEC-MCEE 2015.1, NASDTEC-MCEE 2015.3, NASDTEC-MCEE 2015.4, CAEP-2013 (rev).1.1, CAEP-2013 (rev).1.2, InTASC-2017.10.r, CAEP-Initial 2022.R1.4 |
The candidate respects authority, colleagues, students, and others. AND The candidate accepts constructive feedback in a respectful, appropriate manner. AND The candidate demonstrates appropriate behavior; possesses patience, self control, and flexibility when obstacles or difficult situations occur. AND The candidate effectively manages personal emotions and feelings and reacts reasonably to situations. AND The candidate adheres to proper, formulated chains of command/expresses a grievance in a dignified, temperate manner. AND The candidate acts confidently and maturely. AND The candidate dresses in a dignified, modest manner that adheres to the dress code of the Host School. AND The candidate effectively uses the English language in speech and writing. |
The candidate lacks respect for others. OR The candidate responds negatively to correction. OR The candidate is impatient or inflexible OR The candidate fails to follow the proper chain of command. OR The candidate fails to abide by the dress code of the Host School. OR The candidate has many errors in written communication. |
The candidate has not provided any evidence. |
|
|
Comments: |
||||
|
10.000 pts | 100 % |
||||
Suggested Letter Grade Rubric Directions
15 Dec 2023 Page 7 of 7
|
Please provide a suggested letter grade to signify the candidate's overall performance and effort in the placement. |
Standards Chart
|
Institution: |
Liberty University |
|
Student: |
Jennifer Helfenbein |
|
Supervisor: |
Elizabeth McEachern |
|
Site: |
Concord Junior High School |
|
Date: |
Fall 2025 - Term A (08/18/25 - 12/12/25) |
|
Type: |
EDST 562 (OSS_PT1(Onsite Supervisor - Site Supervisor)) |
|
Final Completed: |
10/27/25 10:23 AM |


SHARE