Shaneequa S. Bennett
Pharmacy Student (P3)
Anticipated Graduation: May 2023
Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Science (Worcester Campus)
|
Description:
For our entrepreneurship project, my group chose to develop a pharmacy in a college town. The pharmacy design was similar to one of the current retail designs, but also included specialized services. Three critical factors that guided our design were: target population, affordability, and product and service variability.
Feelings:
After reading our business plan, I gathered that effort and thought were placed into its completion. I feel that we did a sufficient job of outlining what the blueprint for opening an independent pharmacy would look like. I also feel that we could have brought a bit more innovation into the project.
Evaluation:
Our project “Billdoor” added to patient care and patient outcomes by providing health care services and accessibility to the students and faculty of the local colleges and universities. We designed our business to operate in tandem with their particular needs and varying schedules. In our initial design of the project, I believed that we prioritized being patient-care centered. Thus, there is no difference in how I view our project adding to patient outcomes then compared to now.
Analysis:
In addition to the three factors previously noted, I would like to add collaboration. I believe that it would further develop our relationship with the existing health care community by collaborating with local physicians and providers. By creating this relationship and network, we can offer greater benefit to our customers by being knowledgeable in regards to what services local providers offer.
Conclusion/Action:
The primary value of “Billdoor” was providing health care services and accessibility to the local students and faculty of the local colleges and universities. In rural college towns, health care services may be difficult to access and have a slim period of hours of operation. One barrier in our project was engaging only one audience (students and faculty of the local colleges and universities). I think that expanding our target audience to more than that specific group would increase sales and benefit the surrounding community.
Ethics Reflection #2- Genomics Case
Today's class discussion was centered around pharmacogenomics and genetic testing. This discussion was interesting to me because I believe that pharmacogenomics will shift the way that pharmacy is practiced. Currently, healthcare is delivered in a patient-care-centered model; However, treatment plans are still taking an all-inclusive approach. With the use of pharmacogenomics and genetic testing, we will be able to further tailor a patient's treatment plan. This will be allowing health care professions to maximize the benefits to the patient and minimize or remove unnecessary drug therapy.
The case that we were given today was not as detailed as the two we previously had. Thus, we discussed the various viewpoints rather quickly. It was difficult for me to choose a perspective that clearly stood out as impeding on the ethical principles and rules. Nevertheless, the perspective that I found myself wrestling with was the perspective of HM's PCP. HM's PCP was exercising beneficence by requesting that HM and his family be monitored by public health. The information that would be gathered from their experience would benefit future persons diagnosed with HM's condition. HM's PCP was advocating on behalf of his profession and the overall advancement of science. On the other hand, HM's PCP was also exercising autonomy by not forcing, but rather, requesting for HM and his family members to participate in data collection.
Fortunately, I have not had an experience where I have encountered this type of ethical dilemma. Furthermore, I am not certain how I would navigate such a topic. If I were in the shoes of HM's PCP, I believe that I would navigate the situation in the same manner. I would present all potential options and expound on the consequences of each. I would also advocate for my profession and the advancement of science. Lastly, I would hold paramount the autonomy of my patient.